All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	"Udo A. Steinberg" <udo@hypervisor.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.30: missing audio device in bttv
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:04:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090612100409.04bb0fe5@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906120118.20700.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:18:20 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2009 01:07:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > I suspect that we'll need to work with the initialization order after the new
> > i2c binding model to avoid such troubles.
> > 
> > I remember that we had a similar issue with alsa and saa7134. At the end, Linus [1]
> > had to do add this, as a quick hack (unfortunately, it is still there - it
> > seems that alsa guys forgot about that issue):
> > 
> > late_initcall(saa7134_alsa_init);
> > 
> > On that time, he suggested the usage of subsys_initcall() for alsa. I suspect
> > that we'll need to do the same for I2C and for V4L core. I'm not sure what
> > would be the alternative to be done with i2c ancillary drivers.
> > 
> > Maybe one alternative would be to use fs_initcall, that seems to be already
> > used by some non-fs related calls, like cpu governor [2].
> 
> As long as the i2c modules come first there shouldn't be any problem. That's
> pretty easy to arrange. So the i2c core inits first, then i2c drivers, then
> v4l2 drivers. That's the proper order.

This is already what we have in 2.6.30 as far as I can see.

> The ir-kbd-i2c module needed to be after the v4l2 modules since that still
> relies on autoprobing. If it comes first, then it seems to mess up tveeprom
> for some reason. Once ir-kbd-i2c no longer does autoprobing, then it probably
> should move back to the other i2c modules.

Hopefully this will happen in the next few days :)

-- 
Jean Delvare

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-12  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11 20:14 2.6.30: missing audio device in bttv Udo A. Steinberg
2009-06-11 20:18 ` [v4l-dvb-maintainer] " Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 20:22   ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 22:20     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-06-11 22:26       ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 23:07         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-06-11 23:18           ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-12  8:04             ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-06-11 21:38   ` Udo A. Steinberg
2009-06-11 21:46     ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 22:35       ` Udo A. Steinberg
2009-06-11 23:01         ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-12  0:00           ` Udo A. Steinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090612100409.04bb0fe5@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=udo@hypervisor.org \
    --cc=v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.