All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Marco <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@soe.ucsc.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:59:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090613155957.GA16220@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A33A7A2.1050608@gmail.com>

Marco wrote:
> Linux traditionally had no support for a persistent, non-volatile
> RAM-based filesystem, persistent meaning the filesystem survives a
> system reboot or power cycle intact. The RAM-based filesystems such as
> tmpfs and ramfs have no actual backing store but exist entirely in the
> page and buffer caches, hence the filesystem disappears after a system
> reboot or power cycle.

Why is a ramdisk not sufficient for this?

Why is an entire filesystem needed, instead of simply a block driver
if the ramdisk driver cannot be used?

It just struck me as a lot of code which might be completely
unnecessary for the desired functionality.

-- Jamie

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-13 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-13 13:20 [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem Marco
2009-06-13 13:41 ` Daniel Walker
2009-06-13 15:59 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-06-14  7:15   ` Marco
2009-06-14  7:15     ` Marco
2009-06-14 11:08     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-14 11:08       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-15 15:51       ` Bryan Henderson
2009-06-15 17:42         ` Marco
2009-06-14 11:46     ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-14 16:04       ` Marco
2009-06-16 15:07         ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-16 19:15           ` Marco
2009-06-24 17:41             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-25  6:44               ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-25  6:44                 ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-26 11:30                 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-26 11:30                   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-26 16:56                   ` Marco
2009-06-24 14:21                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-21  6:40     ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-21 17:34       ` Marco
2009-06-21 17:34         ` Marco
2009-06-21 20:52         ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-22  6:33           ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-22 17:20             ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-22 17:31               ` Tim Bird
2009-06-22 17:37                 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-22 18:07                   ` Marco
2009-06-22 20:40                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-06-22 20:40                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-22 21:50                       ` Tim Bird
2009-06-22 21:57                         ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-22 22:38                           ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-22 23:26                             ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-23  1:42                               ` David VomLehn
2009-06-23 18:07                           ` Marco
2009-06-23 18:29                             ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-24 17:47                               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-25  6:32                                 ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-25  6:32                                   ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-22 18:55                   ` Tim Bird
2009-06-22 21:02                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-22 22:02                       ` Tim Bird
2009-06-22 18:08                 ` Marco
2009-06-15 17:15 ` Tim Bird
2009-06-15 17:44   ` Marco
2009-06-15 17:58     ` Tim Bird
2009-06-17 18:32 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-18  6:35   ` Marco Stornelli
     [not found] <4a4254e2.09c5660a.109d.46f8@mx.google.com>
2009-06-24 16:49 ` Marco
2009-06-24 17:38   ` Marco
2009-06-24 17:59     ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-25  6:30       ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-25  6:30         ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-28  8:59         ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-28 16:44           ` Marco Stornelli
2009-06-28 17:33           ` Marco Stornelli
2009-07-09 23:42             ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-24 17:46   ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090613155957.GA16220@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=dwalker@soe.ucsc.edu \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.