From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checksyscalls.sh: only whine perf_counter_open when supported
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:37:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090614093725.GD832@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0906130348p474faf57yeb729aa07059c599@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:48:52AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If the port does not support HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS, then they can't support
> > the perf_counter_open syscall either. ??Rather than forcing everyone to add
> > an ignore (or suffer the warning until they get around to implementing
> > support), only whine about the syscall when applicable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>
> Andrew: could you pick this up since Ingo acked it now ?
I fail to see why this is necessary? cond_syscall() takes care of this in
the not implemented case, the same as every other syscall backing some
feature that has yet to be implemented.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-14 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 11:29 [PATCH] scripts/checksyscalls.sh: only whine perf_counter_open when supported Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 12:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 12:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 12:41 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 13:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 13:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 15:25 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-12 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 17:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 13:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 15:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 15:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 15:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-12 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 21:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-13 10:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 9:37 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-06-14 9:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 10:11 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-14 10:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 11:20 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-14 11:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-14 11:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-13 11:11 Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090614093725.GD832@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.