From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug in tty ldisc and friends
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090616104559.GA29880@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090616103435.GI5139@amd.com>
* Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:29:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > We are now well below the limit for stack-trace entries.
> >
> > This is something we noticed recently: dma-debug uses a lot of
> > lock classes and thus creates a really large lock-graph,
> > depleting the reserves quickly.
>
> Is this considered a problem? I increased the hash-size to 1024
> for performance reasons (== 1024 spin_locks). But if it hurts to
> much in other places this can be reverted.
Lockdep running out of stack slots is a problem - but we dont want
to revert your patch: lockdep is really a helper to development, it
just observes, never hinders changes like that.
The good news is that the (untested) patch i sent should largely
solve this problem and reduce dma-debug's lockdep footprint by a
factor of 1024.
Reverting your change would only be a workaround really.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 5:45 bug in tty ldisc and friends Steven Rostedt
2009-06-16 8:37 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-16 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 8:57 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-16 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:04 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-16 10:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-16 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-16 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 11:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-16 12:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 15:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-17 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-17 14:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-17 14:28 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090616104559.GA29880@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.