All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Chris Van Hoof" <vanhoof@redhat.com>,
	"Clark Williams" <williams@redhat.com>,
	"Caitlin Bestler" <caitlin.bestler@gmail.com>,
	"Steven Whitehouse" <steve@chygwyn.com>,
	" Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>,
	"Neil Horman" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"Nivedita Singhvi" <niv@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:36:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906161636.10522.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090611215341.GF22424@ghostprotocols.net>

On Thursday 11 June 2009 05:53:42 pm Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:09:22PM -0400, Paul Moore escreveu:
> > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 11:40:22 pm Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> > > index 791d71a..f9f1e20 100644
> > > --- a/net/socket.c
> > > +++ b/net/socket.c
> > > @@ -702,6 +702,28 @@ int sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
> > > msghdr *msg, return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int sock_recvmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> > > +			      size_t size, int flags)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct kiocb iocb;
> > > +	struct sock_iocb siocb;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	init_sync_kiocb(&iocb, NULL);
> > > +	iocb.private = &siocb;
> > > +
> > > +	siocb.sock = sock;
> > > +	siocb.scm = NULL;
> > > +	siocb.msg = msg;
> > > +	siocb.size = size;
> > > +	siocb.flags = flags;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = sock->ops->recvmsg(&iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> > > +	if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret)
> > > +		ret = wait_on_sync_kiocb(&iocb);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> >
> > Hmmm, in an effort to reduce duplicated code how about updating
> > __sock_recvmsg() to something like the following:
> >
> > static inline int __sock_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
> >                                  struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int
> > flags) {
> >         int err;
> >
> >         err = security_socket_recvmsg(...);
> >         if (err)
> >                 return err;
> >
> >         return sock_recvmsg_nosec(...);
> > }
> >
> > The only real difference is that now the *_kiocb() functions get called
> > and I have no clue if that is good or bad but it is different :)
>
> Yeah, gets clearer, like this:
>
> static inline int __sock_recvmsg_nosec(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket
> *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int flags)
> {
> 	struct sock_iocb *si = kiocb_to_siocb(iocb);
>
> 	si->sock = sock;
> 	si->scm = NULL;
> 	si->msg = msg;
> 	si->size = size;
> 	si->flags = flags;
>
> 	return sock->ops->recvmsg(iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> }
>
> static inline int __sock_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
> 				 struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int flags)
> {
> 	int err = security_socket_recvmsg(sock, msg, size, flags);
>
> 	return err ?: __sock_recvmsg_nosec(iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> }
>
> static int sock_recvmsg_nosec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 			      size_t size, int flags)
> {
> 	struct kiocb iocb;
> 	struct sock_iocb siocb;
> 	int ret;
>
> 	init_sync_kiocb(&iocb, NULL);
> 	iocb.private = &siocb;
> 	ret = __sock_recvmsg_nosec(&iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
> 	if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret)
> 		ret = wait_on_sync_kiocb(&iocb);
> 	return ret;
> }
>
> Better now? :-)

Sorry for the delay, I was away for a few days and just got back to email this 
morning ... but yes, much better now, thanks :)

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-16 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11  3:40 [RFC v2] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-11  9:41 ` David Miller
2009-06-11 15:34   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-12  0:00     ` David Miller
2009-06-11 22:58   ` [RFC v3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-11 18:09 ` [RFC v2] " Paul Moore
2009-06-11 21:53   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-06-16 20:36     ` Paul Moore [this message]
2009-06-12  7:26 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-06-12 14:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906161636.10522.paul.moore@hp.com \
    --to=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=caitlin.bestler@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com \
    --cc=steve@chygwyn.com \
    --cc=vanhoof@redhat.com \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.