From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] CLONE_PARENT and pid namespaces Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:47:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20090618024743.GA31515@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Oleg Nesterov , roland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Pavel Emelyanov , Alexey Cc: Containers , sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, "David C. Hansen" List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Its not clear what the semantics should be when CLONE_PARENT is combined with pid namespaces. Patches in this set prevent CLONE_PARENT with pid namespaces, at least until we have a better understanding of what the semantics should be. The patches seem to compile/boot, but could use more testing...