From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27D5B72A5 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:23:00 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add configurable -Werror for arch/powerpc Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:22:18 +0200 References: <1245052241.7705.78.camel@concordia> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200906181622.18349.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 15 June 2009, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/setup.c:378: error: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes > > What's so bad about a frame size larger than 1024? > It's not necessarily a bug, but all frame sizes in the call chain combined must never exceed the kernel stack size. 1024 is an arbitrary limit that we warn about for a single function, because it's likely that things will break if you have more than one of these. Arnd <><