From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cr: fix compilation with CONFIG_UTS_NS=n Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:09:29 -0500 Message-ID: <20090618170929.GA7535@us.ibm.com> References: <20090617001723.GA9452@us.ibm.com> <4A3A6F61.5030401@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A3A6F61.5030401-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org): > > I think it's useful to be able to > > 1) checkpoint on a system with !CONFIG_UTS_NS, and - > 2) checkpoint on a system with CONFIG_UTS_NS and restart on a > system with !CONFIG_UTS_NS (as long as all tasks in the image > share a single uts-ns) > > So I moved the code to checkpoint/namespace.c where it compiles > either way. That sounds good :) -serge