From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sending pci information over the wire
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:12:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090618201227.GI3517@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3A9D89.5000305@codemonkey.ws>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:03:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have some trial code here for a proposal, which I'd like to hear your
>> opinions about (Well, I _had_, because I'm totally stupid and git reset'd --hard
>> the wrong location, that happened to contain part of the code for it)
>>
>> Let me start by explaining what I'm trying to accomplish, and say that I myself
>> am not sure this is the best approach, it is just a crazy idea that poped up.
>>
>> Right now, migration of pci devices work by a bit of luck. This is because the
>> other side of the wire can enumerate the devices in a different order, causing
>> them to end up at different addresses. Markus approach of pci_addr= patches
>> do help that fact.
>>
>> However, theoretically, there can be a case in which we:
>> * start receiving guest, with parameters determined by pci_addr=
>> * start live migration
>> * add a device.
>>
>
> Once we have a machine config (and please, let's avoid the 2017 jokes
> please), I imagine that the machine config will be transferred as a
> non-live section.
>
> That will solve this problem quite nicely.
Sure.
Question is, whether or not there is any value in doing this now.
I may argue that this could raise issues early, and the rework needed
to make it work can pave the way for a machine config, making things
easier for it.
Or maybe not.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-18 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-18 19:39 [Qemu-devel] sending pci information over the wire Glauber Costa
2009-06-18 20:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-18 20:12 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2009-06-18 20:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-19 8:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-19 13:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-19 14:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-19 14:47 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-19 15:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-19 15:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-19 15:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-20 18:58 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090618201227.GI3517@poweredge.glommer \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.