From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHj1Z-0005fa-Ed
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:41:17 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHj1U-0005fO-Kz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:41:16 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44893 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHj1U-0005fL-HH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:41:12 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:43083)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jcd@tribudubois.net>) id 1MHj1T-0000XJ-U9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:41:12 -0400
Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.6])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jcd@tribudubois.net>) id 1MHj1R-0004lu-4r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:41:09 -0400
From: "Jean-Christophe Dubois" <jcd@tribudubois.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/12] fix qemu_alloc/qemu_free for
	linux-user subsystem
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:40:58 +0200
References: <y> <1245358219-13170-5-git-send-email-jcd@tribudubois.net>
	<1245408639.11443.13.camel@system>
In-Reply-To: <1245408639.11443.13.camel@system>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906192040.59253.jcd@tribudubois.net>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: vibi_sreenivasan@cms.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hello Vibi,

Le vendredi 19 juin 2009 12:50:39 vibi sreenivasan, vous avez =E9crit :
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 22:50 +0200, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
> > From: Jean-Christophe Dubois <jcd@jcd-laptop.(none)>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net>
> > ---
> >  linux-user/main.c    |   10 +++++-----
> >  linux-user/syscall.c |   16 ++++++++--------
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> I can see an alternate implementation for
> qemu_malloc & other related functions in linux-user/mmap.c

This is true. It sounds that the various xxx-user subsystems are not using =
the=20
main qemu_malloc.c implementation.

But this is just a fact ... I am not sure how I should interpret your comme=
nt.

JC

>
> Thanks & Regards
> Vibi Sreenivasan