From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] __nf_ct_refresh_acct(): WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:30 __list_add+0x7d/0xad()
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:47:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090620154716.GA12901@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3A5599.4080906@trash.net>
* Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> Ingo, could you please try whether this patch (combined with the
> last one) makes any difference? Enabling CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
> could also help.
Mind pushing it upstream, and i'll keep things monitored over the
week following when it hits upstream?
The reason is, the crash ratio is worse than 1:1000, it took a day
and a 1000 tests to trigger that one. I havent seen it after that.
So it's going to be a very slow observation and you shouldnt
serialize on me - giving you a 'it works' positive result will take
10,000 random bootp tests or so - that's a week or longer. (it can
take a long time to hit that especially in the merge window when
there's a lot of various test failures that cause hickups in the
test stream.)
( Mailing me an upstream sha1 when all fixes in this area have hit
upstream would certainly be welcome - i can use that as a 'no
crashes expected in that area from that point on' flag day. )
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-20 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-15 12:04 [GIT]: Networking David Miller
2009-06-15 12:04 ` David Miller
2009-06-16 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 9:19 ` David Miller
2009-06-16 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 9:44 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-16 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 9:56 ` David Miller
2009-06-16 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:35 ` David Miller
2009-06-16 13:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-16 14:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-16 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 19:08 ` David Miller
2009-06-16 19:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-16 20:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 6:41 ` [PATCH] net: correct off-by-one write allocations reports Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 11:31 ` [PATCH] atm: sk_wmem_alloc initial value is one Eric Dumazet
2009-06-18 2:06 ` David Miller
2009-06-18 2:05 ` [PATCH] net: correct off-by-one write allocations reports David Miller
2009-06-17 11:32 ` [GIT]: Networking David Miller
2009-06-16 9:21 ` David Miller
2009-06-16 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 10:47 ` David Miller
2009-06-16 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 12:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-16 12:39 ` David Miller
2009-06-17 9:21 ` [bug] __nf_ct_refresh_acct(): WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:30 __list_add+0x7d/0xad() Ingo Molnar
2009-06-17 10:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-17 11:35 ` David Miller
2009-06-18 5:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-18 5:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-18 5:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-18 9:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-18 14:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-18 15:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-18 16:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-18 16:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-06-18 22:46 ` [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: death_by_timeout() fix Eric Dumazet
2009-06-19 11:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-20 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-20 15:56 ` [bug] __nf_ct_refresh_acct(): WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:30 __list_add+0x7d/0xad() Patrick McHardy
2009-06-17 11:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-17 11:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-17 11:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 12:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-17 12:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 12:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-17 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 13:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-17 14:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-17 15:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-17 15:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-18 23:18 ` [GIT]: Networking Tilman Schmidt
2009-06-19 3:36 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090620154716.GA12901@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.