From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mbizon@freebox.fr, dada1@cosmosbay.com,
pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix NULL pointer + success return in route lookup path
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:00:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090622110023.GA6994@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090622085950.GA26598@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:59:50PM +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:43:15AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > Maybe it can work, but it needs a thorough checking now and adds a new
> > code path to track later while looking for bugs. So, I wonder if it's
> > not better to link such dsts in rt_intern_hash anyway, probably as a
> > separate list, scanned only for expired entries.
>
> Such a list already exists, it is gc list in core/dst.c.
>
> The fix to the problem could be replacing rt_drop() with rt_free()
> (adding rt_free() after the patch, which deleted rt_drop()), something like:
>
> if (!rt_caching(dev_net(rt->u.dst.dev))) {
> /* ..... */
> + rt_free(rt);
> goto report_and_exit;
> }
>
> rt_free() will put the route on that gc list and it will be releases
> as soon as refcnt becomes 0.
One little doubt would be RCU: if it's currently used in rt_free, and
some code depends on it, there would be a change: rt could be freed
just after atomic dec, without waiting for RCU yet. The second one is
about timing: freeing this always from a workqueue could probably
make a problem if softirqs are often disabled.
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 17:18 [PATCH] fix NULL pointer + success return in route lookup path Neil Horman
2009-06-20 8:15 ` David Miller
2009-06-20 12:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-20 16:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-20 17:11 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-20 17:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-20 23:47 ` David Miller
2009-06-21 17:11 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-22 5:43 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-22 8:59 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2009-06-22 9:42 ` David Miller
2009-06-22 10:56 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-22 11:00 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-06-22 11:08 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-22 12:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-22 15:10 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-22 11:29 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2009-06-22 12:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-06-20 16:44 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090622110023.GA6994@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.