From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
avi@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref_get interface
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:52:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090622185235.GH15228@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906221140570.10952@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:41:53AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > Absolutely. But IMO documentation in the form of "fields A B C are
> > protected by lock X" in a single place near field declaration is better
> > than "we take lock X here to protect against race with user thread using
> > fields A B C" sprinkled all over the code.
>
> Exactly what akpm suggested.
Everything that can be invented has been invented.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-22 16:05 [KVM PATCH v3 0/3] irqfd/eventfd fixes Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 16:05 ` [KVM PATCH v3 1/3] kvm: prepare irqfd for having interrupts disabled during eventfd->release Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 16:05 ` [KVM PATCH v3 2/3] eventfd: add internal reference counting to fix notifier race conditions Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 16:05 ` [KVM PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref_get interface Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 16:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 17:31 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 17:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 18:03 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 18:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 18:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 18:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 18:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-06-22 18:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-06-23 14:55 ` Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090622185235.GH15228@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.