From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757892AbZFWHNX (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:13:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755289AbZFWHNM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:13:12 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:59888 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753505AbZFWHNL (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:13:11 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: ioctl return value fix Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:43:10 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-13-generic; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <20090620192941.GA26873@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20090620192941.GA26873@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906231643.10623.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:59:41 am Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Block driver ioctl methods must return ENOTTY and not -ENOIOCTLCMD if > they expect the block layer to handle generic ioctls. > > This triggered a BLKROSET failure in xfsqa #200. Applied. Thanks, Rusty.