All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance counter 20% error finding retired instruction count
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:13:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090625091324.GA16860@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245912600.31755.21.camel@twins>


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 22:12 -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > 
> > It's also nice to be able to skip the loader overhead, as the 
> > loader can change from system to system and makes it hard to 
> > compare counters across various machines.  Though it sounds like 
> > the perf utility isn't going to be supporting this anytime soon.
> 
> Feel free to contribute such if you think its important.

I'd be glad to review and test any resulting patches from Vince - 
and/or help out with pointers where to start and help out there's 
any roadblocks along the way.

The kernel side bits can be found in v2.6.31-rc1, in 
kernel/perf_counter.c, include/linux/perf_counter.h and 
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c. We tried to keep the code as 
hackable as possible.

The tooling bits can be found in tools/perf/ in the kernel repo. 
builtin-stat.c contains the 'perf stat' bits.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-25  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-24 13:59 performance counter 20% error finding retired instruction count Vince Weaver
2009-06-24 15:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-25  2:12   ` Vince Weaver
2009-06-25  6:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-25  9:13       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-26 18:22   ` Vince Weaver
2009-06-26 19:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-27  5:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 19:23     ` Vince Weaver
2009-06-27  6:04       ` performance counter ~0.4% " Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27  6:44         ` [numbers] perfmon/pfmon overhead of 17%-94% Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 18:25           ` Vince Weaver
2009-06-29 21:02             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-02 21:07               ` Vince Weaver
2009-07-03  7:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 21:43                   ` Vince Weaver
2009-07-03 18:31                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-03 21:25                   ` Vince Weaver
2009-07-03 23:40                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-29 23:46             ` [patch] perf_counter: Add enable-on-exec attribute Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 23:55             ` [numbers] perfmon/pfmon overhead of 17%-94% Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30  0:05             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27  6:48         ` performance counter ~0.4% error finding retired instruction count Paul Mackerras
2009-06-27 17:28           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29  2:12             ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-29  2:13               ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-29  3:48               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090625091324.GA16860@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.