From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:58:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:45775 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492827AbZFYM6q (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:58:46 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5PCsmB8001642; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:54:49 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n5PCsmGE001638; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:54:48 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:54:48 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Maxime Bizon Cc: Florian Fainelli , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make Broadcom SoC naming options consistent Message-ID: <20090625125448.GA10661@linux-mips.org> References: <200906251034.32811.florian@openwrt.org> <20090625114258.GA32558@linux-mips.org> <1245930973.30592.63.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1245930973.30592.63.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 23499 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:56:13PM +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote: > > Thanks. Patch applied nad tree respun against -rc1. With the AR7 > > stuff finally merged this makes the BCM stuff the longest pending to > > be merged ... > > I'm considering removing non MIPS stuff (ethernet, usb, pcmcia) from the > patchset for the moment. Getting ACKs from all subsystems on the same > merge window is too difficult. > > That way you could merge the CPU support in your tree, and the drivers > could go via subsystems trees on the next merge window. > > What do you think ? Agreed. I think I'll start off by posting the whole series to the list for everybody's reviewing pleassure then let's sort the whole thing. Ralf