From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve lpage NUMA support
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090625195408.GW6760@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A43871F.9030507@zytor.com>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 07:18:07AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>>
> >> *Ahem* virtual machines *ahem*...
> >
> > And? Even there's not that big typically.
> >
> > The traditional problem was just for 128 NR_CPUs kernel were nothing
> > was sized based on machine capacity.
> >
> > Also on large systems the VMs shouldn't be sized for full capacity.
> >
>
> We have already have cases where the "possible" CPUs have eaten up the
> entire vmalloc area on 32 bits. In real use. It's a real problem.
That's hard to believe or a serious bug/misconfiguration somewhere.
Each per CPU data should be <100k (let's say 200k with some slack for modules),
so to fill vmalloc you would need hundreds of CPUs, which a 32bit
kernel doesn't really support anyways because it doesn't support
enough memory for that many CPUs.
Perhaps you had firmware/hypervisor who passed a gigantic impossible
value here? If yes thy
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 13:30 [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve lpage NUMA support Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86: make pcpu_chunk_addr_search() matching stricter Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] percpu: drop @unit_size from embed first chunk allocator Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86,percpu: generalize 4k " Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] percpu: make 4k first chunk allocator map memory Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-13 10:12 ` David Howells
2009-07-15 3:17 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86,percpu: generalize lpage first chunk allocator Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] percpu: simplify pcpu_setup_first_chunk() Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] percpu: reorder a few functions in mm/percpu.c Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] percpu: drop pcpu_chunk->page[] Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] percpu: allow non-linear / sparse cpu -> unit mapping Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] percpu: teach large page allocator about NUMA Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-24 23:55 ` [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve lpage NUMA support Andrew Morton
2009-06-25 0:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-25 0:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 9:19 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-25 14:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 19:54 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-06-25 20:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 20:26 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-26 0:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-26 2:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-26 6:54 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-25 2:35 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-25 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 23:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-29 23:39 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-30 14:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 19:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 19:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 20:21 ` Scott Lurndal
2009-06-30 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 22:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 22:40 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 0:48 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-30 22:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 23:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 23:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 23:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 6:34 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-30 23:20 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-30 23:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 23:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-01 6:42 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-01 12:23 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 12:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-01 13:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 17:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-01 22:42 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-03 23:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-03 23:14 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090625195408.GW6760@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.