From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@gmail.com>
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openezx-devel@lists.openezx.org,
sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCAP RTC driver (for 2.6.32).
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:23:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090626132310.60665a98.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245962749.10360.42.camel@brutus>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:45:49 -0300
Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@gmail.com> wrote:
> RTC driver for PCAP2 PMIC.
>
> This patch was sent some time ago and acked by Alessandro, but we had to
> change some stuff on the core driver and consequently on this driver
> too, so I'm submitting it again for review (sorry).
>
> Signed-off-by: guiming zhuo <gmzhuo@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@gmail.com>
The above paragraph contains nothing which is relevant to the final
commit changelog, so I removed it. I thus ended up without any
changelog at all.
Oh well - perhaps there wasn't much to say anyway.
> diff -puN drivers/rtc/Kconfig~pcap-rtc-driver-for-2632 drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig~pcap-rtc-driver-for-2632
> +++ a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> @@ -778,4 +778,11 @@ config RTC_DRV_PS3
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called rtc-ps3.
>
> +config RTC_DRV_PCAP
> + tristate "PCAP RTC"
> + depends on EZX_PCAP
> + help
> + If you say Y here you will get support for the RTC found on
> + the PCAP2 ASIC used on some Motorola phones.
> +
> endif # RTC_CLASS
> diff -puN drivers/rtc/Makefile~pcap-rtc-driver-for-2632 drivers/rtc/Makefile
> --- a/drivers/rtc/Makefile~pcap-rtc-driver-for-2632
> +++ a/drivers/rtc/Makefile
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX6902) += rtc-max
> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MSM6242) += rtc-msm6242.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MV) += rtc-mv.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP) += rtc-omap.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCAP) += rtc-pcap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8563) += rtc-pcf8563.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8583) += rtc-pcf8583.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PL030) += rtc-pl030.o
> diff -puN /dev/null drivers/rtc/rtc-pcap.c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcap.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
> +/*
> + * pcap rtc code for Motorola EZX phones
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2008 guiming zhuo <gmzhuo@gmail.com>
> + * Copyright (c) 2009 Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@gmail.com>
> + *
> + * Based on Motorola's rtc.c Copyright (c) 2003-2005 Motorola
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/ezx-pcap.h>
> +#include <linux/rtc.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +struct pcap_rtc {
> + struct pcap_chip *pcap;
> + struct rtc_device *rtc;
> +};
> +
> +static irqreturn_t pcap_rtc_irq(int irq, void *_pcap_rtc)
> +{
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc = _pcap_rtc;
> + unsigned long rtc_events = 0;
> +
> + if (irq == pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_1HZ))
> + rtc_events |= RTC_IRQF | RTC_UF;
> + else if (irq == pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_TODA))
> + rtc_events |= RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF;
> +
> + rtc_update_irq(pcap_rtc->rtc, 1, rtc_events);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
This could be coded more simply:
unsigned long rtc_events;
if (irq == pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_1HZ))
rtc_events = RTC_IRQF | RTC_UF;
else if (irq == pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_TODA))
rtc_events = RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF;
> +static int pcap_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct rtc_time *tm = &alrm->time;
> + unsigned long secs;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + ezx_pcap_read(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_TODA, &tmp);
> + secs = tmp & PCAP_RTC_TOD_MASK;
> +
> + ezx_pcap_read(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_DAYA, &tmp);
> + secs += (tmp & PCAP_RTC_DAY_MASK) * SEC_PER_DAY;
> +
> + rtc_time_to_tm(secs, tm);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
SEC_PER_DAY is defined in include/linux/mfd/ezx-pcap.h. It should not
be, because it is not specific to that driver and can be used elsewhere
in the kernel.
I'd suggest that we
- define SECS_PER_DAY in include/linux/time.h
- remove the private definitions of SECS_PER_DAY from
arch/m68k/mac/misc, arch/parisc/include/asm/rtc.h,
arch/ia64/hp/sim/boot/fw-emu.c, fs/udf/udftime.c, fs/fat/misc.c and
wherever else it appears, make those files use the common definition
- migrate rtc-pcap.c from SEC_PER_DAY over to the common SECS_PER_DAY.
- Then do it all again for SECS_PER_MIN and SECS_PER_HOUR.
What a mess.
None of the above is applicable in the context of this patch.
> +static int pcap_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct rtc_time *tm = &alrm->time;
> + unsigned long secs;
> + u32 tmp;
"tmp" is a poor identifier. We had an opportunity here to use an
identifier which would communicate useful information to the reader.
But we blew it and used the information-free "tmp" instead.
Something like
u32 time_of_day; /* In seconds since midnight */
would be nice. If that is indeed what the variable contains. How
would I know? It's called 'tmp" and is undescribed!
> + rtc_tm_to_time(tm, &secs);
> +
> + tmp = secs % SEC_PER_DAY;
> + ezx_pcap_write(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_TODA, tmp);
> +
> + tmp = secs / SEC_PER_DAY;
> + ezx_pcap_write(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_DAYA, tmp);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pcap_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + unsigned long secs;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + ezx_pcap_read(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_TOD, &tmp);
> + secs = tmp & PCAP_RTC_TOD_MASK;
> +
> + ezx_pcap_read(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_DAY, &tmp);
> + secs += (tmp & PCAP_RTC_DAY_MASK) * SEC_PER_DAY;
> +
> + rtc_time_to_tm(secs, tm);
> +
> + return rtc_valid_tm(tm);
> +}
> +
> +static int pcap_rtc_set_mmss(struct device *dev, unsigned long secs)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + tmp = secs % SEC_PER_DAY;
> + ezx_pcap_write(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_TOD, tmp);
> +
> + tmp = secs / SEC_PER_DAY;
> + ezx_pcap_write(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_REG_RTC_DAY, tmp);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
etceteras
> +static inline int pcap_rtc_irq_enable(struct device *dev, int pirq,
> + unsigned int en)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + if (en)
> + enable_irq(pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, pirq));
> + else
> + disable_irq(pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, pirq));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Inlining this function probably made the code larger and slower.
> +static int pcap_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int en)
> +{
> + return pcap_rtc_irq_enable(dev, PCAP_IRQ_TODA, en);
> +}
> +
> +static int pcap_rtc_update_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int en)
> +{
> + return pcap_rtc_irq_enable(dev, PCAP_IRQ_1HZ, en);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rtc_class_ops pcap_rtc_ops = {
> + .read_time = pcap_rtc_read_time,
> + .read_alarm = pcap_rtc_read_alarm,
> + .set_alarm = pcap_rtc_set_alarm,
> + .set_mmss = pcap_rtc_set_mmss,
> + .alarm_irq_enable = pcap_rtc_alarm_irq_enable,
> + .update_irq_enable = pcap_rtc_update_irq_enable,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit pcap_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc;
> + int timer_irq, alarm_irq;
> + int err = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pcap_rtc = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pcap_rtc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pcap_rtc)
> + return err;
> +
> + pcap_rtc->pcap = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + pcap_rtc->rtc = rtc_device_register("pcap", &pdev->dev,
> + &pcap_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> + if (IS_ERR(pcap_rtc->rtc)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(pcap_rtc->rtc);
> + goto fail_rtc;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcap_rtc);
> +
> + timer_irq = pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_1HZ);
> + alarm_irq = pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_TODA);
> +
> + err = request_irq(timer_irq, pcap_rtc_irq, 0, "RTC Timer", pcap_rtc);
> + if (err)
> + goto fail_timer;
> +
> + err = request_irq(alarm_irq, pcap_rtc_irq, 0, "RTC Alarm", pcap_rtc);
> + if (err)
> + goto fail_alarm;
> +
> + return 0;
> +fail_alarm:
> + free_irq(timer_irq, pcap_rtc);
> +fail_timer:
> + rtc_device_unregister(pcap_rtc->rtc);
> +fail_rtc:
> + kfree(pcap_rtc);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit pcap_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pcap_rtc *pcap_rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + free_irq(pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_1HZ), pcap_rtc);
> + free_irq(pcap_to_irq(pcap_rtc->pcap, PCAP_IRQ_TODA), pcap_rtc);
> + rtc_device_unregister(pcap_rtc->rtc);
> + kfree(pcap_rtc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver pcap_rtc_driver = {
> + .remove = __devexit_p(pcap_rtc_remove),
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "pcap-rtc",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init rtc_pcap_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_probe(&pcap_rtc_driver, pcap_rtc_probe);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit rtc_pcap_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&pcap_rtc_driver);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(rtc_pcap_init);
> +module_exit(rtc_pcap_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Motorola pcap rtc driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("guiming zhuo <gmzhuo@gmail.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");>
It's a nice little driver.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-26 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 20:45 [PATCH] PCAP RTC driver (for 2.6.32) Daniel Ribeiro
2009-06-25 20:53 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2009-06-25 21:16 ` Daniel Ribeiro
2009-06-25 21:21 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2009-06-26 20:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-06-26 20:33 ` Joe Perches
2009-06-26 23:57 ` Daniel Ribeiro
2009-06-27 0:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-27 3:50 ` [PATCHv2] " Daniel Ribeiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090626132310.60665a98.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=drwyrm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openezx-devel@lists.openezx.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.