From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: userspace cannot use scsi_command_size_tbl, COMMAND_SIZE and scsi_device_type Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:28:21 -0600 Message-ID: <20090627182821.GC5480@parisc-linux.org> References: <1246122359.32198.7.camel@hpdv5.satnam> <1246123628.3990.19.camel@mulgrave.site> <1246125388.32198.14.camel@hpdv5.satnam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:54764 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751706AbZF0S2T (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:28:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1246125388.32198.14.camel@hpdv5.satnam> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Cc: James Bottomley , Sam Ravnborg , Boaz Harrosh , Benny Halevy , LKML , linux-scsi On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:26:28PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 22:35 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > userspace cannot use scsi_command_size_tbl, COMMAND_SIZE > > > and scsi_device_type defined in kernel When did we start exporting include/scsi to userspace? I thought glibc had its own separate definitions. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."