From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Ratan Nalumasu <rnalumasu@gmail.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] do not place sub-threads on task_struct->children list
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:11:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090702181145.GA28581@redhat.com> (raw)
Thanks to Roland who pointed out de_thread() issues.
Currently we add sub-threads to ->real_parent->children list. This
buys nothing but slows down do_wait().
With this patch ->children contains only main threads (group leaders).
The only complication is that forget_original_parent() should iterate
over sub-threads by hand, and de_thread() needs another list_replace()
when it changes ->group_leader.
>From now do_wait_thread() can never see task_detached() && !EXIT_DEAD
tasks, we can remove this check (and we can unify do_wait_thread() and
ptrace_do_wait()).
This change can confuse the optimistic search in mm_update_next_owner(),
but this is fixable and minor.
Perhaps badness() and oom_kill_process() should be updated, but they
should be fixed in any case.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 2 ++
kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
kernel/exit.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- WAIT/fs/exec.c~4_CHILDREN_NO_THREADS 2009-07-01 20:01:54.000000000 +0200
+++ WAIT/fs/exec.c 2009-07-02 19:27:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -827,7 +827,9 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct
attach_pid(tsk, PIDTYPE_PID, task_pid(leader));
transfer_pid(leader, tsk, PIDTYPE_PGID);
transfer_pid(leader, tsk, PIDTYPE_SID);
+
list_replace_rcu(&leader->tasks, &tsk->tasks);
+ list_replace_init(&leader->sibling, &tsk->sibling);
tsk->group_leader = tsk;
leader->group_leader = tsk;
--- WAIT/kernel/fork.c~4_CHILDREN_NO_THREADS 2009-07-01 20:01:54.000000000 +0200
+++ WAIT/kernel/fork.c 2009-07-02 19:27:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -1245,7 +1245,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
}
if (likely(p->pid)) {
- list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
tracehook_finish_clone(p, clone_flags, trace);
if (thread_group_leader(p)) {
@@ -1257,6 +1256,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
p->signal->tty = tty_kref_get(current->signal->tty);
attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID, task_pgrp(current));
attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID, task_session(current));
+ list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
list_add_tail_rcu(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
__get_cpu_var(process_counts)++;
}
--- WAIT/kernel/exit.c~4_CHILDREN_NO_THREADS 2009-07-02 18:44:43.000000000 +0200
+++ WAIT/kernel/exit.c 2009-07-02 19:56:33.000000000 +0200
@@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task
detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID);
list_del_rcu(&p->tasks);
+ list_del_init(&p->sibling);
__get_cpu_var(process_counts)--;
}
list_del_rcu(&p->thread_group);
- list_del_init(&p->sibling);
}
/*
@@ -736,12 +736,9 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reap
/*
* Any that need to be release_task'd are put on the @dead list.
*/
-static void reparent_thread(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p,
+static void reparent_leader(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p,
struct list_head *dead)
{
- if (p->pdeath_signal)
- group_send_sig_info(p->pdeath_signal, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, p);
-
list_move_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
if (task_detached(p))
@@ -780,12 +777,18 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struc
reaper = find_new_reaper(father);
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &father->children, sibling) {
- p->real_parent = reaper;
- if (p->parent == father) {
- BUG_ON(task_ptrace(p));
- p->parent = p->real_parent;
- }
- reparent_thread(father, p, &dead_children);
+ struct task_struct *t = p;
+ do {
+ t->real_parent = reaper;
+ if (t->parent == father) {
+ BUG_ON(task_ptrace(t));
+ t->parent = t->real_parent;
+ }
+ if (t->pdeath_signal)
+ group_send_sig_info(t->pdeath_signal,
+ SEND_SIG_NOINFO, t);
+ } while_each_thread(p, t);
+ reparent_leader(father, p, &dead_children);
}
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -1533,14 +1536,9 @@ static int do_wait_thread(struct wait_op
struct task_struct *p;
list_for_each_entry(p, &tsk->children, sibling) {
- /*
- * Do not consider detached threads.
- */
- if (!task_detached(p)) {
- int ret = wait_consider_task(wo, tsk, 0, p);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
+ int ret = wait_consider_task(wo, tsk, 0, p);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
return 0;
reply other threads:[~2009-07-02 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090702181145.GA28581@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rnalumasu@gmail.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=vmayatsk@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.