From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mads Martin Joergensen Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:06:13 +0000 Subject: Re: moderation only by sender Message-Id: <20090708050613.GA730@mmj.dk> List-Id: References: <5e77c93d0907031333q4cba6335ib8f8622a40518edf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5e77c93d0907031333q4cba6335ib8f8622a40518edf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org * Thomas Goirand [Jul 08. 2009 06:53]: > Morten K. Poulsen wrote: > > You probably don't send automated newsletters from your phone. > > I do, when doing server maintenance with putty, I might need to warn all > customers of this server, which I do using an MLMMJ moderated list. > > To me, if you guys want to add such flag, this would be to keep > compatibility with the old behavior where MLMMJ is sending the > moderation to all moderators. The default should be to bounce ONLY to > the moderator sending to the list. IMHO mlmmj-make-ml should create new > list with the tunable in by default. I really wouldn't like changing default behaviour, ever. It's not like they make "-s" the default for "ln" even though that's what most people use all the time. > Another thing, when I add myself as moderator, then use the "subscriber > only post" flag, I can't send to the list unless I also subscribe. This > doesn't make sense. All moderator should be considered as able to write > to the list, even if they are not subscribed and the flag "subscriber > only post" is set. Can this behavior be changed as well??? Should be, I agree. Owners as well. -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J.