From: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@morethan.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:31:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907081731.33106.lkml@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0907081658260.22105-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed July 8 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Michael S. Zick wrote:
>
> > > Like I've been telling you all along, the hardware isn't working.
> > >
> >
> > That sounds very fragile.
>
> I'm not sure how to interpret that sentence. If you mean that your
> system's hardware design isn't good, I agree. If you mean that the
> kernel shouldn't produce a lot of output when faced with broken
> hardware, that's not so clear. What else should it do (bearing in mind
> that the kernel can't tell the hardware is broken)?
>
It is unlikely that VIA Tech. will recall the CX700 chipset.
So being able to take a device off-line (like the driver claims it is doing)
and *leave* it off-line - until told to "try again" - that would be an
improvement.
The current process of filling up the /var/log directory until the machine
chokes is a rather fragile sort of response to a hot-plugged device, good or bad.
> > > I suspect it's worse than a simple interrupt-routing mistake.
> > >
> >
> > I would not object to your removing that one mistake - that is one less
> > to contend with.
>
> I didn't say there was an interrupt-routing mistake; I said it was
> _worse_ than an interrupt-routing mistake.
>
Never claimed you did - the driver made that claim.
But still, it would be nice to get rid of the interrupt-routing mistake.
I suppose waiting for the OLPC project to find and fix the problem is
a viable alternative also.
You will not be the first to give up on this C7-M/CX700 combination. ;)
> > > > > > For more information enable CONFIG_USB_DEBUG and CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, then
> > > > > > see what's sitting in the usb/uhci/* files in debugfs.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > Fours up-time - nothing written to dmesg since boot -
> > Just the usual hard-lockup.
> >
> > Also - something in the combined fix/diagnostic patch
> > disable any sensing of external usb events.
> > So I couldn't very well poke devices at it. ;)
>
> You should take out those BUG statements. If they ever trigger, they
> will certainly lock up your system.
>
Although I would expect that they not do so silently.
I take them out and just in time before starting the next
round of testing.
Mike
> Alan Stern
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-05 22:20 Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 9:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-07-07 14:08 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-07 14:32 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 15:10 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 15:23 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 15:31 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 15:43 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 17:28 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 17:56 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 19:21 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 19:51 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 20:00 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-07 20:52 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-07 21:24 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 19:54 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 14:43 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 16:30 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 16:38 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-11 19:07 ` uhci_hcd fails to off-line device/hub on error condition Michael S. Zick
2009-07-12 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 19:57 ` Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd Alan Stern
2009-07-08 20:22 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 21:02 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 22:31 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2009-07-09 14:18 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 23:56 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-08 23:59 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-09 14:20 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-09 14:46 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-09 15:08 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-09 16:07 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-07-09 20:58 ` Michael S. Zick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907081731.33106.lkml@morethan.org \
--to=lkml@morethan.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.