From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Make cond_resched*() available earlier
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:45:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090708204545.GA3216@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247057926.9777.54.camel@twins>
Using early netconsole and gianfar driver this error pops up:
netconsole: timeout waiting for carrier
It appears that net/core/netpoll.c:netpoll_setup() is using
cond_resched() in a loop waiting for a carrier.
The thing is that cond_resched() is a no-op when system_state !=
SYSTEM_RUNNING, and so drivers/net/phy/phy.c's state_queue is never
scheduled, therefore link detection doesn't work.
The system_state check exists to avoid very early calls to the
scheduler. Though, using cond_resched() should be safe after scheduler
is initialized, so instead of checking the system_state, we can test
that the scheduler is running, therefore making cond_resched() and
friends available much earlier (but not too much).
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
---
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:58:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[...]
> > > > Hm. Speaking of cond_resched*() only, then it should be pretty
> > > > safe to convert the SYSTEM_RUNNING checks to scheduler_running,
> > > > no? scheduler_running is set after sched_init().
> > >
> > > Hmm, that might work, I'd have to audit sched_init_smp() as it seems to
> > > do way too much...
> >
> > sched_init_smp() is called from the kernel_thread(), so
> > if the scheduler is not functional prior to kernel_thread(),
> > you're in trouble anyway, no? The point is that a lot of
> > code is calling schedule() prior to sched_init_smp()
> > (e.g. msleep(), mutexes), and there are no issues. So
> > should be no issues with cond_resched()?
>
> Yeah, it should be good, I just got paranoid looking at
> sched_init_smp().
OK, thanks everyone for the reviews.
Here is an updated patch. As usual, tested on UP PowerPC, with and
without SMP, PREEMPT and PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY.
kernel/sched.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 7c9098d..555360b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -6561,7 +6561,7 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
int __sched _cond_resched(void)
{
if (need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE) &&
- system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
+ scheduler_running) {
__cond_resched();
return 1;
}
@@ -6579,7 +6579,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
*/
int cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
- int resched = need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
+ int resched = need_resched() && scheduler_running;
int ret = 0;
if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
@@ -6599,7 +6599,7 @@ int __sched cond_resched_softirq(void)
{
BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
- if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
+ if (need_resched() && scheduler_running) {
local_bh_enable();
__cond_resched();
local_bh_disable();
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 23:58 [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks from cond_resched*() Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 0:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-07-08 6:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 12:03 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 12:55 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-08 20:45 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-07-08 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-08 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-08 21:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-08 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-08 22:20 ` [PATCH] netpoll: Fix carrier detection for drivers that are using phylib Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-09 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-09 3:08 ` David Miller
2009-07-09 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 12:56 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 13:26 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 14:18 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 14:43 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-09 15:06 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-09 12:52 ` Matt Mackall
2009-07-09 23:20 ` [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks from cond_resched*() Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090708204545.GA3216@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.