From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MOwBb-00027D-9J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:09:27 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MOwBW-000218-8j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:09:26 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45685 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MOwBW-00020v-3y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:09:22 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:24218)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1MOwBV-0003kN-PF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:09:21 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1MOwBU-00046w-JP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:09:20 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3 v2] Add a pc-0-10 machine type for
	compatibility with 0.10.x
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:09:16 +0100
References: <1244821292.30522.56.camel@blaa> <4A55BFE7.4070402@redhat.com>
	<4A55F21A.7060704@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4A55F21A.7060704@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200907091709.17926.paul@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

> It came out looking pretty good.  The literal syntax is new to me:
>
> +    .compat_props = (CompatProperty[]) {
> +        {
>
> I assume this is a GCC-ism?

Compound literals ("(Foo[]){...}") are a standard C99 feature, as are 
designated initializers (".foo = ...")

Paul