From: Raghu Gandham <raghu@mips.com>
To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: raghu@mips.com, chris@mips.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Avoid queing multiple reschedule IPI's in SMTC
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:06:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090710090600.26243.2749.stgit@linux-raghu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090710090529.26243.22320.stgit@linux-raghu>
From: Jaidev Patwardhan <jaidev@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Dearman <chris@mips.com>
---
arch/mips/include/asm/smtc_ipi.h | 5 +++--
arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/smtc_ipi.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/smtc_ipi.h
index 8ce5175..832b8be 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/smtc_ipi.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/smtc_ipi.h
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ struct smtc_ipi {
void *arg;
int dest;
#ifdef SMTC_IPI_DEBUG
- int sender;
- long stamp;
+ unsigned sender;
+ unsigned long long stamp;
#endif /* SMTC_IPI_DEBUG */
};
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct smtc_ipi_q {
spinlock_t lock;
struct smtc_ipi *tail;
int depth;
+ int resched_flag; /* reschedule already queued */
};
static inline void smtc_ipi_nq(struct smtc_ipi_q *q, struct smtc_ipi *p)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c
index c16bb6d..ed4c04c 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ unsigned long irq_hwmask[NR_IRQS];
asiduse smtc_live_asid[MAX_SMTC_TLBS][MAX_SMTC_ASIDS];
-
/*
* Number of InterProcessor Interrupt (IPI) message buffers to allocate
*/
@@ -388,6 +387,7 @@ void smtc_prepare_cpus(int cpus)
IPIQ[i].head = IPIQ[i].tail = NULL;
spin_lock_init(&IPIQ[i].lock);
IPIQ[i].depth = 0;
+ IPIQ[i].resched_flag = 0; /* No reschedules queued initially */
}
/* cpu_data index starts at zero */
@@ -741,11 +741,24 @@ void smtc_forward_irq(unsigned int irq)
static void smtc_ipi_qdump(void)
{
int i;
+ struct smtc_ipi *temp;
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS ;i++) {
- printk("IPIQ[%d]: head = 0x%x, tail = 0x%x, depth = %d\n",
+ pr_info("IPIQ[%d]: head = 0x%x, tail = 0x%x, depth = %d\n",
i, (unsigned)IPIQ[i].head, (unsigned)IPIQ[i].tail,
IPIQ[i].depth);
+ temp = IPIQ[i].head;
+
+ while (temp != IPIQ[i].tail) {
+ pr_debug("%d %d %d: ", temp->type, temp->dest,
+ (int)temp->arg);
+#ifdef SMTC_IPI_DEBUG
+ pr_debug("%u %lu\n", temp->sender, temp->stamp);
+#else
+ pr_debug("\n");
+#endif
+ temp = temp->flink;
+ }
}
}
@@ -784,11 +797,15 @@ void smtc_send_ipi(int cpu, int type, unsigned int action)
int mtflags;
unsigned long tcrestart;
extern void r4k_wait_irqoff(void), __pastwait(void);
+ int set_resched_flag = (type == LINUX_SMP_IPI &&
+ action == SMP_RESCHEDULE_YOURSELF);
if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
printk("Cannot Send IPI to self!\n");
return;
}
+ if (set_resched_flag && IPIQ[cpu].resched_flag != 0)
+ return; /* There is a reschedule queued already */
/* Set up a descriptor, to be delivered either promptly or queued */
pipi = smtc_ipi_dq(&freeIPIq);
if (pipi == NULL) {
@@ -801,6 +818,7 @@ void smtc_send_ipi(int cpu, int type, unsigned int action)
pipi->dest = cpu;
if (cpu_data[cpu].vpe_id != cpu_data[smp_processor_id()].vpe_id) {
/* If not on same VPE, enqueue and send cross-VPE interrupt */
+ IPIQ[cpu].resched_flag |= set_resched_flag;
smtc_ipi_nq(&IPIQ[cpu], pipi);
LOCK_CORE_PRA();
settc(cpu_data[cpu].tc_id);
@@ -847,6 +865,7 @@ void smtc_send_ipi(int cpu, int type, unsigned int action)
*/
write_tc_c0_tchalt(0);
UNLOCK_CORE_PRA();
+ IPIQ[cpu].resched_flag |= set_resched_flag;
smtc_ipi_nq(&IPIQ[cpu], pipi);
} else {
postdirect:
@@ -996,12 +1015,15 @@ void deferred_smtc_ipi(void)
* already enabled.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
-
spin_lock(&q->lock);
pipi = __smtc_ipi_dq(q);
spin_unlock(&q->lock);
- if (pipi != NULL)
+ if (pipi != NULL) {
+ if (pipi->type == LINUX_SMP_IPI &&
+ (int)pipi->arg == SMP_RESCHEDULE_YOURSELF)
+ IPIQ[cpu].resched_flag = 0;
ipi_decode(pipi);
+ }
/*
* The use of the __raw_local restore isn't
* as obviously necessary here as in smtc_ipi_replay(),
@@ -1082,6 +1104,9 @@ static irqreturn_t ipi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_idm)
* with interrupts off
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
+ if (pipi->type == LINUX_SMP_IPI &&
+ (int)pipi->arg == SMP_RESCHEDULE_YOURSELF)
+ IPIQ[cpu].resched_flag = 0;
ipi_decode(pipi);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-10 9:05 [PATCH 0/2] Port MT and SMTC changes from linux-mti Raghu Gandham
2009-07-10 9:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add debug prints during CPU intialization Raghu Gandham
2009-07-10 9:06 ` Raghu Gandham [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090710090600.26243.2749.stgit@linux-raghu \
--to=raghu@mips.com \
--cc=chris@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.