From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752773AbZGLK3H (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:29:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751527AbZGLK24 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:28:56 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:56719 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751247AbZGLK24 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:28:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:28:47 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Daniel Walker Cc: greg@kroah.com, swetland@google.com, malchev@google.com, kernel list Subject: Re: HTC Dream: qdsp support for staging Message-ID: <20090712102847.GD2033@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20090710083709.GA6418@elf.ucw.cz> <1247246757.7146.33.camel@desktop> <20090711230509.GA4705@elf.ucw.cz> <1247356604.5967.6.camel@desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1247356604.5967.6.camel@desktop> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat 2009-07-11 16:56:44, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 01:05 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Fri 2009-07-10 10:25:57, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 10:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > From: Iliyan Malchev > > > > > > > > QDSP code is neccessarry for communication with some hardware > > > > components on HTC Dream, including camera hardware. It also drives DSP > > > > coproccessor. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek > > > > > > You don't want to break it up into multiple patches? I'll do it if you > > > don't want too .. > > > > I don't know how much sense it makes to split it further... yes, I > > could probably split it per file or something but... > > > > (Notice that this is going to be rewriten in staging, anyway, before > > merging into kernel proper...) > > Your expecting a full re-write? From a quick look this stuff just looks > like it needs some TLC .. I don't know what TLC means. I expect a lot of changes; I did not study it in great enough detail; but I suspect that the ammount of changes neccessary will drown any initial changesets, so I guess it is simpler to just merge it in one piece. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html