[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/6] Clean up top-level directory structure

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>]

On 22:42 Fri 10 Jul     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 10 July 2009 21:20:45 Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> > Peter Tyser wrote:
> > >> Before verifying MIPS builds, I'd like to make sure that why you take
> > >> lib/$(ARCH)/ alternative, not $(ARCH)/lib/.  If there were any
> > >> discussion on #IRC, is there any chance we could share the summary or
> > >> decision to follow?
> > >
> > > There was no discussion, /lib/$(ARCH) just made more sense to me and it
> > > was functionally a direct translation from lib_$(ARCH) to lib/$(ARCH).
> > >
> > > Using $(ARCH)/lib wouldn't clean up the top-level directory structure
> > > much and would open a can of worms that I'm not prepared to deal with at
> > > this time.  For example, if there was an architecture specific
> >
> > Oops, I wanted to say "arch/$(ARCH)/lib/", not $(ARCH)/lib/, sorry.
> 
> i thought that originally, but i dont care much either way.  having 
> arch/$(ARCH)/ would line up with u-boot-v2 and the linux kernel though.
> 
> i dont understand needing a lib/ subdir under arch/$(ARCH)/ though.
> 
> > > While we're talking about it, I'd always thought it would be nice to
> > > split out all the cmd_* files from common/ into their own command/
> > > directory similar to u-boot-v2.
> >
> > Ack.  The directory structure in u-boot-v2 looks nice, at least, to me,
> > anyway.
I prefer the
arch/$(ARCH)/lib
so will could also move the cpu stuff there too

for the command dir why not

Best Regards,
J.