From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6DHAi8I027157 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:10:44 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6DHASvf024797 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:10:29 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6DH3XB8017238 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:03:33 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6DH6p3w223828 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:06:51 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6DH6ot5031667 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:06:50 -0600 Received: from malahal.localdomain (malahal.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.130]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6DH6ont031642 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:06:50 -0600 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:06:49 -0700 From: malahal@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM mirroring or mdadm Message-ID: <20090713170649.GA9504@us.ibm.com> References: <200907131732.20178.imobachgs@banot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907131732.20178.imobachgs@banot.net> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Imobach Gonz?lez Sosa [imobachgs@banot.net] wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a pair of identical Seagate disks on a server and I'm considering > using a software RAID (RAID1). I was thinking of setting up LVM on a mdadm > RAID, but I've read that LVM has support itself for mirroring. > > So, what is the better approach? Using LVM mirroring capabilities or putting > the LVM on a mdadm RAID 1? LVM on mdadm RAID1 is more stable than LVM's own mirroring at the moment. --Malahal.