From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Deepak Saxena Subject: Re: [PATCH] viafb: update driver to use both I2C Channels Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:57:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20090715205720.GA10819@plexity.net> References: <20090715190158.GA9699@plexity.net> <20090715201732.GZ11272@prithivi.gnumonks.org> Reply-To: dsaxena@laptop.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090715201732.GZ11272@prithivi.gnumonks.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devel-bounces@lists.laptop.org Errors-To: devel-bounces@lists.laptop.org To: Harald Welte Cc: Deepak Saxena , JosephChan@via.com.tw, ScottFang@viatech.com.cn, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, OLPC SW Development List On Jul 15 2009, at 22:17, Harald Welte was caught saying: > Hi Deepak, > > as I have pointed out a couple of times to some OLPC folks (not sure if you > were included), there is a via-viafb-i2c tree in my git tree (http://git.gnumonks.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=linux-2.6-via.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/via-viafb-i2c) > that tries to clean up the i2c mess (after cleaning up a lot of other mess). > > I've submitted a long series of those viafb patches some time ago, but somehow > none of them was merged mainline yet :( > > Were you aware of this? If yes, then it means that you're reluctant to merge > the tons of not-yet-mainline cleanup code from my tree, which I could > understand, too. Nope, was not aware of this. Will grab that tree and take a look at it. Thanks, ~Deepak