From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, andi@firstfloor.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbaron@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090718132535.GC32618@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090714.094804.869026176829743314.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
* Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:19 +0200
>
> > X-Mew-Uidl: 4144 3205
> > Return-Path: <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Received: from murder ([unix socket])
> > by ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp (Cyrus v2.3.8-OS X Server 10.5: 9F33) with LMTPA;
> > Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:35 +0900
> > X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
> > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> > by ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418376729D2
> > for <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:35 +0900 (JST)
> > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp
> > Received: from ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp ([127.0.0.1])
> > by localhost (ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
> > with ESMTP id 4VNvZ6jG1jE9 for <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>;
> > Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:34 +0900 (JST)
> > Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu (mx3.mail.elte.hu [157.181.1.138])
> > by ns.dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08246729C2
> > for <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:33 +0900 (JST)
> > Received: from elvis.elte.hu ([157.181.1.14])
> > by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim)
> > id 1MQHFr-0003wM-HT
> > from <mingo@elte.hu>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:28 +0200
> > Received: by elvis.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1004)
> > id 115B83E22CE; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:21 +0200 (CEST)
> > Message-ID: <20090713085119.GA6757@elte.hu>
> > References: <1247230336.7529.34.camel@twins> <20090712.162337.287595819039280884.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> <1247405045.6733.2.camel@laptop> <20090713.150612.886429910823138064.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > In-Reply-To: <20090713.150612.886429910823138064.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
> > X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
> > X-ELTE-SpamLevel:
> > X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
> > X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0
> > X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
> > Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, andi@firstfloor.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
> > acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
> > Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:19 +0200
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
> > Received-SPF: neutral (mx3: 157.181.1.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elte.hu) client-ip=157.181.1.14; envelope-from=mingo@elte.hu; helo=elvis.elte.hu;
> > X-Mew: tab/spc characters on Subject: are simplified.
> >
> >
> > * Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
> >
> > > > Yeah, steve broke it, but then Jason fixed it again, but his
> > > > patches might not have made it in yet.
> > > >
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/6/313
> > >
> > > Wow! I can obtain lock_acquire with Jason's patch,
> > >
> > > % perf stat -e lockdep:lock_acquire sleep 1
> > >
> > > Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
> > >
> > > 1420 lockdep:lock_acquire
> > >
> > > 1.004953591 seconds time elapsed
> > >
> > > I wanted this.
> > > So I don't have nothing to do.., but thanks Jason!
> >
> > I gave some review feedback about those patches, see:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/13/360
> >
> > Once they are addressed we can try them in -tip.
>
> Thanks! I'll try new features of perfcounters. It's interesting.
> But I told "not found" by lkml.org.
>
> Is the post you attempted to point
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/13/36 ?
yeah. The first post should be:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/6/313
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-18 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 6:21 [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 8:21 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 13:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-01 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 14:17 ` mitake
2009-07-01 7:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 8:42 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 9:42 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 12:53 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-01 15:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-06 5:20 ` mitake
2009-07-06 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-06 11:54 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-10 12:45 ` mitake
2009-07-10 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-10 13:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-10 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-12 7:23 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-12 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-13 6:06 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-13 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-14 0:48 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-07-18 13:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-07-01 12:40 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 13:50 ` [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat II Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 9:48 ` [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired how many spinlocks to schedstat Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090718132535.GC32618@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.