From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Alberto Gonzalez <alberto6674@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>,
Alberto Gonzalez <alberto6674@gmail.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30 and udevd problem
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:10:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090720111010.28bf7b76@jbarnes-g45> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907050010.44254.info@gnebu.es>
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:10:43 +0200
Alberto Gonzalez <alberto6674@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2009 00:00:49 Michal Soltys wrote:
> > Regarding Arch's default distro kernel - it's a bit patched. Most
> > of the patch file is addition of aufs, but there're other diffs
> > included as well, some of them modifying i915_reg.h,
> > intel_display.c and intel_tv.c
> >
> > ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/kernel26/patch-2.6.30-5-ARCH.bz2
> >
> > Not sure how relevant that is, but fyi.
>
> Yes, thanks for pointing that out.
>
> I now tried a vanilla 2.6.30.1 kernel with a custom config (so I
> don't have to wait 45 minutes for it to compile) and I still see the
> problem. This is what I get in dmesg:
>
> [ 83.506496] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 83.506500] WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c:452
> drm_sysfs_hotplug_event+0x2b/0x63()
> [ 83.506502] Hardware name: Studio 540
> [ 83.506503] hotplug uevent
> [ 83.506504] Modules linked in:
> [ 83.506506] Pid: 7, comm: events/0 Tainted: G W 2.6.30.1 #1
> [ 83.506507] Call Trace:
> [ 83.506511] [<c1025df9>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
> [ 83.506514] [<c11e9f9e>] ? drm_sysfs_hotplug_event+0x2b/0x63
> [ 83.506517] [<c1025e44>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> [ 83.506520] [<c11e9f9e>] drm_sysfs_hotplug_event+0x2b/0x63
> [ 83.506523] [<c11f33de>] i915_hotplug_work_func+0xe/0x10
> [ 83.506525] [<c1032f28>] worker_thread+0x131/0x1ab
> [ 83.506528] [<c11f33d0>] ? i915_hotplug_work_func+0x0/0x10
> [ 83.506531] [<c1035f61>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> [ 83.506534] [<c1032df7>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1ab
> [ 83.506536] [<c1035c84>] kthread+0x46/0x6a
> [ 83.506538] [<c1035c3e>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6a
> [ 83.506541] [<c10033cf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> [ 83.506542] ---[ end trace 08f91010f92f7c3c ]---
Sorry I missed this update; what about the register dump part of the
patch? Presumably you get a ton of these in your log, but with some
IIR register info beforehand?
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Alberto Gonzalez <alberto6674@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>,
Alberto Gonzalez <alberto6674@gmail.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30 and udevd problem
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:10:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090720111010.28bf7b76@jbarnes-g45> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907050010.44254.info@gnebu.es>
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:10:43 +0200
Alberto Gonzalez <alberto6674@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2009 00:00:49 Michal Soltys wrote:
> > Regarding Arch's default distro kernel - it's a bit patched. Most
> > of the patch file is addition of aufs, but there're other diffs
> > included as well, some of them modifying i915_reg.h,
> > intel_display.c and intel_tv.c
> >
> > ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/kernel26/patch-2.6.30-5-ARCH.bz2
> >
> > Not sure how relevant that is, but fyi.
>
> Yes, thanks for pointing that out.
>
> I now tried a vanilla 2.6.30.1 kernel with a custom config (so I
> don't have to wait 45 minutes for it to compile) and I still see the
> problem. This is what I get in dmesg:
>
> [ 83.506496] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 83.506500] WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c:452
> drm_sysfs_hotplug_event+0x2b/0x63()
> [ 83.506502] Hardware name: Studio 540
> [ 83.506503] hotplug uevent
> [ 83.506504] Modules linked in:
> [ 83.506506] Pid: 7, comm: events/0 Tainted: G W 2.6.30.1 #1
> [ 83.506507] Call Trace:
> [ 83.506511] [<c1025df9>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
> [ 83.506514] [<c11e9f9e>] ? drm_sysfs_hotplug_event+0x2b/0x63
> [ 83.506517] [<c1025e44>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> [ 83.506520] [<c11e9f9e>] drm_sysfs_hotplug_event+0x2b/0x63
> [ 83.506523] [<c11f33de>] i915_hotplug_work_func+0xe/0x10
> [ 83.506525] [<c1032f28>] worker_thread+0x131/0x1ab
> [ 83.506528] [<c11f33d0>] ? i915_hotplug_work_func+0x0/0x10
> [ 83.506531] [<c1035f61>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> [ 83.506534] [<c1032df7>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1ab
> [ 83.506536] [<c1035c84>] kthread+0x46/0x6a
> [ 83.506538] [<c1035c3e>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6a
> [ 83.506541] [<c10033cf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> [ 83.506542] ---[ end trace 08f91010f92f7c3c ]---
Sorry I missed this update; what about the register dump part of the
patch? Presumably you get a ton of these in your log, but with some
IIR register info beforehand?
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-20 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-28 6:21 Kernel 2.6.30 and udevd problem Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-28 6:21 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-28 10:37 ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-28 10:37 ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-28 12:37 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-28 12:37 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-28 12:49 ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-28 12:49 ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-28 14:22 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-28 14:22 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-28 14:28 ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-28 14:28 ` Kay Sievers
2009-06-30 3:40 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-30 3:40 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-06-30 3:46 ` Dave Airlie
2009-06-30 3:46 ` Dave Airlie
2009-06-30 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-30 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-01 7:09 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-01 7:09 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-01 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-01 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-02 6:18 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-02 6:18 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-02 16:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-02 16:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-02 19:37 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-02 19:37 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-02 22:00 ` Michal Soltys
2009-07-02 22:00 ` Michal Soltys
2009-07-04 22:10 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-04 22:10 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-20 18:10 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2009-07-20 18:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-20 21:06 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-20 21:06 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-20 22:48 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-22 13:25 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-22 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 16:51 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-22 17:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 17:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 18:43 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-22 18:43 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-22 19:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 19:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 19:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 19:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-22 20:00 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-22 20:00 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-23 0:06 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-07-23 0:06 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-08-06 13:53 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-08-06 13:53 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-08-06 21:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-08-06 21:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-08-06 22:17 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2009-08-06 22:17 ` Alberto Gonzalez
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-28 5:53 Alberto Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090720111010.28bf7b76@jbarnes-g45 \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alberto6674@gmail.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soltys@ziu.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.