From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org, spender@grsecurity.net,
dwalsh@redhat.com, cl@linux-foundation.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: mmap_min_addr and your local LSM (ok, just SELinux)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:48:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090720204848.5f37c92a@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248132223.2654.278.camel@localhost>
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:23:43 -0400
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Does anyone see a better way to let users continue to be users while
> protecting most people? Yes SELinux is stronger in some areas than
> without confining the ability to map the 0 page, but as has be rightly
> pointed out it's foolish an broken that SELinux can weaken any
> protections.
one option is to allow the page to be mapped, but only as
non-executable... in DOS that memory isn't where code lives anyway...
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-21 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-20 23:23 mmap_min_addr and your local LSM (ok, just SELinux) Eric Paris
2009-07-20 23:23 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-21 0:14 ` Christopher Pardy
2009-07-21 0:14 ` Christopher Pardy
2009-07-21 13:41 ` Daniel J Walsh
2009-07-21 13:41 ` Daniel J Walsh
2009-07-21 3:45 ` James Morris
2009-07-21 3:45 ` James Morris
2009-07-21 14:44 ` James Carter
2009-07-21 14:44 ` James Carter
2009-07-22 10:06 ` James Morris
2009-07-22 10:06 ` James Morris
2009-07-28 0:19 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 3:28 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-07-28 9:21 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-28 10:00 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 11:21 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-28 13:35 ` Brad Spengler
2009-07-28 14:48 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-28 15:56 ` Kees Cook
2009-07-28 16:23 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-21 3:48 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-07-21 11:51 ` Brad Spengler
2009-07-21 4:13 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-07-21 11:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-30 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090720204848.5f37c92a@infradead.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.