From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM and kernel 2.6.30 file system madness
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:22:30 +0530
Message-ID: <20090721045230.GA10107@amit-x200.redhat.com>
References: <4A558DE4.3040207@tomorrow-focus.de> <20090715071857.GC2844@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4A5D8AC4.4030105@tomorrow-focus.de> <20090715085557.GA31719@amit-x200.redhat.com> <20090721044250.GD17446@mvw.netvalue.net.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: Mark van Walraven <markv@netvalue.net.nz>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43913 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750987AbZGUEwh (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:52:37 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090721044250.GD17446@mvw.netvalue.net.nz>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On (Tue) Jul 21 2009 [16:42:50], Mark van Walraven wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 02:33:03PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Wed) Jul 15 2009 [09:52:36], Robert Wimmer wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > > Are you using virtio-block?
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > OK, then there is a known problem. I think the fix is waiting to be
> > applied.
> 
> Amit, would you kindly state the problem with virtio-block?

I think it was this one: upstream commit

4eff3cae9c9809720c636e64bc72f212258e0bd5
virtio_blk: don't bounce highmem requests

		Amit