From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] mm: drop unneeded double negations
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:33:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090721093312.GA25383@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248166594-8859-1-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:56:31AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Remove double negations where the operand is already boolean.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> mm/memory.c | 2 +-
> mm/vmscan.c | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 38ad840..8ad148a 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> int nid = z->zone_pgdat->node_id;
> int zid = zone_idx(z);
> struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> - int lru = LRU_FILE * !!file + !!active;
> + int lru = LRU_FILE * file + active;
> int ret;
>
Ok, this should be ok as file and active appear to be 1 and 0.
> BUG_ON(!mem_cont);
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 6521619..dd8eb26 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ copy_one_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
> if (page) {
> get_page(page);
> page_dup_rmap(page, vma, addr);
> - rss[!!PageAnon(page)]++;
> + rss[PageAnon(page)]++;
> }
Similarly, seems ok.
>
> out_set_pte:
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 07fd8aa..46ec6a5 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ int remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
> void putback_lru_page(struct page *page)
> {
> int lru;
> - int active = !!TestClearPageActive(page);
> + int active = TestClearPageActive(page);
> int was_unevictable = PageUnevictable(page);
>
But are you *sure* about this change?
active it used as an array offset later in this function for evictable pages
so it needs to be 1 or 0 but IIRC, the TestClear functions are not guaranteed
to return 0 or 1 on all architectures. They return 0 or non-zero. I'm 99.999%
certain I've been bitten before by test_bit returning the word with the one
bit set instead of 1. Maybe things have changed since or it's my
imagination but can you double check please?
> VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
> @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_pages_global(unsigned long nr,
> if (file)
> lru += LRU_FILE;
> return isolate_lru_pages(nr, &z->lru[lru].list, dst, scanned, order,
> - mode, !!file);
> + mode, file);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
> lru = page_lru(page);
> add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
> if (is_active_lru(lru)) {
> - int file = !!is_file_lru(lru);
> + int file = is_file_lru(lru);
> reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file]++;
> }
> if (!pagevec_add(&pvec, page)) {
> @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
> zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
> }
> - reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[!!file] += nr_taken;
> + reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
>
> __count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
> if (file)
> @@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> * helps balance scan pressure between file and anonymous pages in
> * get_scan_ratio.
> */
> - reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file] += nr_rotated;
> + reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file] += nr_rotated;
> __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
>
> move_active_pages_to_lru(zone, &l_active,
> --
> 1.6.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-21 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 8:56 [patch 1/4] mm: drop unneeded double negations Johannes Weiner
2009-07-21 8:56 ` [patch 2/4] mm: introduce page_lru_type() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 1:52 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-22 9:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 12:37 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-22 16:01 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-21 8:56 ` [patch 3/4] mm: return boolean from page_is_file_cache() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-21 8:56 ` [patch 4/4] mm: return boolean from page_has_private() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 16:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-22 17:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 17:54 ` [patch 5/4] mm: document is_page_cache_freeable() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-22 21:55 ` Li, Ming Chun
2009-07-22 22:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 23:51 ` Li, Ming Chun
2009-07-22 23:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-21 9:33 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-07-21 11:18 ` [patch 1/4] mm: drop unneeded double negations Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090721093312.GA25383@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.