From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Subject: ioctl number overlapped?
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:46:44 +0800
Message-ID: <200907211446.44873.sheng.yang@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:23024 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751896AbZGUGrH (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:47:07 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Happen to see this:

include/linux.kvm.h

503 #define KVM_IRQ_LINE_STATUS       _IOWR(KVMIO, 0x67, struct kvm_irq_level)
504 #define KVM_REGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO \
505                         _IOW(KVMIO,  0x67, struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_zone)

Both ioctl use 0x67, and the code has released to v2.6.30...

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng