From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 3/5] remove clocksource inline functions
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:33:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090722093313.14eda4db@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248213835.3298.112.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:03:55 -0700
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:17 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (clocksource-inline.diff)
> > From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >
> > Remove clocksource_read, clocksource_enable and clocksource_disable
> > inline functions. No functional change.
> >
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/time/clocksource.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> > kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 13 ++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
>
> There's a patch Magnus has that (should be) queued for 2.6.31 that makes
> unbreaks the mult_orig manipulations enable/disable does. I suspect this
> will cause this inline function removing to not be that much of a
> benefit.
After moving the enable/disable code over to clocksource.c there is no
reason for the inline function anymore, no?
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ void clocksource_forward_now(void)
> > cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> > s64 nsec;
> >
> > - cycle_now = clocksource_read(clock);
> > + cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> > cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> > clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
> >
> > @@ -567,16 +567,19 @@ void change_clocksource(void)
> >
> > clocksource_forward_now();
> >
> > - if (clocksource_enable(new))
> > + if (new->enable && !new->enable(new))
> > return;
> >
> > + /* save mult_orig after successful enable */
> > + new->mult_orig = new->mult;
> > +
> > new->raw_time = clock->raw_time;
> > old = clock;
> > clock = new;
> > - clocksource_disable(old);
> > + if (old->disable)
> > + old->disable(old);
>
> mult_orig needs to be saved to mult at this point.
Yes, it would make sense to do that. The old code doesn't so I did not
want to add it in a cleanup patch. That should be a patch on its own.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-22 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 19:17 [RFC][patch 0/5] clocksource cleanup / improvement Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 1/5] move clock source related code to clocksource.c Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:50 ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-21 21:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:00 ` john stultz
2009-07-22 7:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-22 17:45 ` john stultz
2009-07-23 0:28 ` john stultz
2009-07-23 7:53 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-23 10:52 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-25 0:08 ` john stultz
2009-07-27 11:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-23 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 2/5] cleanup clocksource selection Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:07 ` john stultz
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 3/5] remove clocksource inline functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:48 ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-21 22:03 ` john stultz
2009-07-22 7:33 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 4/5] clocksource_read/clocksource_read_raw " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 22:01 ` john stultz
2009-07-22 7:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-21 19:17 ` [RFC][patch 5/5] update clocksource with stop_machine Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090722093313.14eda4db@skybase \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.