From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: sen wang <wangsen.linux@gmail.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kernel@kolivas.org,
npiggin@suse.de, arjan@infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: report a bug about sched_rt
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:40:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090724154036.GG27755@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248446910.6987.111.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> If you're using the bandwidth throttle to control your RT tasks so as
> not to starve your SCHED_OTHER tasks, then I will call your system ill
> designed.
What mechanism should be used to avoid starving SCHED_OTHER tasks, in
the event there are unforeseen bugs or unpredictable calculation times
in an RT task?
Thanks,
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-24 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-24 10:57 report a bug about sched_rt sen wang
2009-07-24 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 13:04 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 13:26 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 13:44 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 14:04 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 14:53 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 15:07 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 15:43 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 15:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-07-25 11:12 ` Raistlin
2009-07-24 14:24 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 15:02 ` sen wang
2009-07-24 15:40 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-07-24 16:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-24 23:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-25 5:22 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-07-25 22:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-26 2:44 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-07-26 19:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-27 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-27 13:35 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-07-25 12:33 ` Raistlin
2009-07-25 14:58 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2009-07-25 12:19 ` Raistlin
2009-07-25 22:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-25 23:24 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2009-07-25 11:10 ` Raistlin
[not found] ` <454c71700907250429i1c77658bt6d65b02f08a29f4a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-07-25 23:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-24 14:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-26 3:55 ` sen wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090724154036.GG27755@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangsen.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.