Re: [PATCH 1/2] MMC Agressive clocking framework v5

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:03:01 -0500
"Madhusudhan" <madhu.cr@ti.com> wrote:

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrian Hunter [mailto:adrian.hunter@nokia.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:16 PM
> > To: Linus Walleij
> > Cc: Linus Walleij; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pierre
> > Ossman; linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk; David Vrabel;
> > marek.vasut@gmail.com; Madhusudhan Chikkature
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MMC Agressive clocking framework v5
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > Have you considered using our enable/disable approach instead?
> > 
> > It is here:
> > 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_frm/thread/a5caec1de127
> > 4be5/2ba7dee2a187a268
> > 
> > Perhaps it meets your needs, whereas your patches do not seem
> > to cover the functionality we need.
> > 
>
> The patch #28 "The omap hsmmc driver code refactoring" in the series does
> not seem to apply.

(top-posting repaired - please don't!)

I got one reject when applying that patch, due to
mmc-register-mmci-omap-hs-using-platform_driver_probe.patch.  It was
simple to fix that up.