From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:10:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-px0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:33887 "EHLO mail-px0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1493442AbZGYTKt (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:10:49 +0200 Received: by pxi8 with SMTP id 8so1750310pxi.22 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=uKDnQ5sP5iShFdZ+0Ls1+D/gKVOdG0XpsThnwGve36U=; b=IpnvxWN8CFBCHvktFtUWUw8tWsIQmSDHxP83zmVhbH8zYaGchCoXja9x7CQfYrQ8Rz Pjnn1sAVJMd36Yte7RWTHqX+5JGLu8+jSeVp90gTOw+AOeokvNgyjeeNO/hmPXnKy4kQ atqiYt9E0qc7Vk67elb9sajYmM5zpNqN/3Tn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sOV3PqvkgJPicjheVGWmjoc9l1r6QoE0ibBwK7EeLMmcMZ63xMJbH4WiEmBbIgIXRo G7lYRnKH9YWSCj++48rzuafdJf7zACW+HdxyMjHrf/YSLSaMbI+jgX7cUZHirLeXszcS ZnJnJkknqsfpecDarVF2CKVgSBD0Ep5LclSEM= Received: by 10.141.1.19 with SMTP id d19mr3071560rvi.145.1248549042290; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.coreip.homeip.net (c-24-6-153-137.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.153.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g14sm6757832rvb.30.2009.07.25.12.10.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:10:37 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Frans Pop Cc: Manuel Lauss , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Manuel Lauss , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion Message-ID: <20090725191037.GE14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> References: <1248275919-3296-1-git-send-email-manuel.lauss@gmail.com> <20090725174449.GC14062@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> <200907252019.01266.elendil@planet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907252019.01266.elendil@planet.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 23775 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:18:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 25 July 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote: > > > Cc: Frans Pop > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss > > > > > > + > > > +static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = { > > > + .resume = au1xmmc_resume, > > > + .suspend = au1xmmc_suspend, > > > +}; > > > + > > > > Was suspend to disk tested? It requires freeze()/thaw(). > > Is that a regression introduced by this patch then? If so, many more of > the recent dev_pm_ops conversion patches would need to be revisited. Yes, as far as I understand they would. Let's ask Rafael to confirm... -- Dmitry