From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, eteo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: smatch and tun.c
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:40:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907262340.57339.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907241400310.12573@bicker>
On Saturday 25 July 2009 14:21:54 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Jonathan Corbet from lwn.net suggested that I write a smatch
> (http://repo.or.cz/w/smatch.git) script to prevent the tun.c type bugs
> from happening again.
>
> I wrote two scripts. One just looks for bugs where a variable is
> dereferenced while initializing a local variable and checked for NULL like
> this:
> int x = foo->bar;
> BUG_ON(!foo);
> I have a theory that sometimes peoople are sloppy when they initialize
> variables. This script printed 96 warnings. The other script prints
> those messages along with every other time a variable is dereferenced and
> then checked for NULL. This script printed 685 messages.
>
> Smatch scripts tends to have a lot of false positives. The script that
> only printed problems with variable initialization was maybe 40% actual
> bugs but the one that checked everything was maybe 15% actual bugs. I
> guess my theory is correct.
>
> One thing that causes false positives is that some macros need to
> check for NULL pointers. Also smatch doesn't handle loops correctly yet.
> Sometimes variables get changed inside another function and that isn't
> handled correctly yet.
Indeed there is still a lot of false positives but the functionality
is already very useful so big thanks for doing it!
> By bugs, I don't mean security bugs, I mean picky little things. Quite
> often places have useless checks for NULL. But still it's worth fixing.
Yes, moreover they are a "noise" which makes discovery of real issues more
time consuming and difficult.
> I feel bad for just sending this email instead of proper bug reports and
> patches, but the truth is that I'm cycling through Africa on a bycicle. I
> sleep in a tent. It took me days to scrape together enough electricity
> and internet to send this one email...
You've just became my personal when it comes to the best use of available
resources! ;)
> I have attached a zip file with the warnings from 2.6.31-rc3 allmodconfig.
> Here are the instructions if you want to use a different config.
> git clone git://repo.or.cz/smatch.git
> cd smatch
> make
> cd /usr/src/linux
> make C=1 CHECK=/path/to/smatch modules bzImage | tee warns.txt
> egrep '(warn|error):' warns.txt | egrep '(before|initializer)'
The last line needs to be:
egrep '(warn|warning|error):' warns.txt | egrep '(before|initializer)'
to make it work, also if somebody wants to see the same list but against
current -next kernel it is here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bart/null-pointer-err-list-next-0724.gz
[ some issues have been fixed already and some line numbers have changed ]
PS I'll also post a "filtered" list (without false positives) in a few days
(I've verified ~50% of entries till now).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-26 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-25 12:21 smatch and tun.c Dan Carpenter
2009-07-26 21:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-07-27 21:30 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907262340.57339.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=eteo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.