From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdesu broken
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:28:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090727135853.GA4223@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090727142303.41096bf5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 02:23:03PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I worried "pair->packet = 0" when I'm thinking this. I guess it would be
> > changed more early than before. Is it ok?
>
> I think so, and we can get stuck otherwise.
>
>
> Tested patch:
>
> commit 70325fd1d4341896c17b6f1f1965370b5258d0b1
> Author: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon Jul 27 14:18:52 2009 +0100
>
> pty: ensure writes hit the reader before close
>
> Implement TTY_EOF/EOFPENDING flags so that we can propogate the close of the
> pty through the buffering correctly. The new flag state is locked but the
> tty buffer lock as it relates to buffers, and also because the buffer
> lock is already held in the hot path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/n_tty.c b/drivers/char/n_tty.c
> index ff47907..acae995 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/n_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/n_tty.c
> @@ -1777,7 +1777,8 @@ do_it_again:
> tty->minimum_to_wake = (minimum - (b - buf));
>
> if (!input_available_p(tty, 0)) {
> - if (test_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->flags)) {
> + if (test_bit(TTY_EOF, &tty->flags)) {
> + /* PTY pair closed and all data consumed */
> retval = -EIO;
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/char/pty.c b/drivers/char/pty.c
> index 6e6942c..de10cc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/pty.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/pty.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static struct tty_driver *pts_driver;
>
> static void pty_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
> {
> + struct tty_struct *pair;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> BUG_ON(!tty);
> if (tty->driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER)
> WARN_ON(tty->count > 1);
> @@ -47,13 +50,22 @@ static void pty_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
> }
> wake_up_interruptible(&tty->read_wait);
> wake_up_interruptible(&tty->write_wait);
> +
> tty->packet = 0;
> - if (!tty->link)
> + pair = tty->link;
> + if (!pair)
> return;
> - tty->link->packet = 0;
> - set_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->link->flags);
> - wake_up_interruptible(&tty->link->read_wait);
> - wake_up_interruptible(&tty->link->write_wait);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pair->buf.lock, flags);
> + pair->packet = 0;
> + /* Indicate that the other end is now closed, set the
> + ENDPENDING marker so that the true end can be processed by
> + the line discipline */
> + set_bit(TTY_EOFPENDING, &pair->flags);
> + set_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &pair->flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pair->buf.lock, flags);
> + wake_up_interruptible(&pair->read_wait);
> + wake_up_interruptible(&pair->write_wait);
> if (tty->driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER) {
> set_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->flags);
> #ifdef CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS
> @@ -180,7 +192,6 @@ static void pty_flush_buffer(struct tty_struct *tty)
>
> if (!to)
> return;
> - /* tty_buffer_flush(to); FIXME */
> if (to->packet) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->ctrl_lock, flags);
> tty->ctrl_status |= TIOCPKT_FLUSHWRITE;
> @@ -191,23 +202,30 @@ static void pty_flush_buffer(struct tty_struct *tty)
>
> static int pty_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
> {
> - int retval = -ENODEV;
> + int retval = -EIO;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct tty_struct *pair;
>
> - if (!tty || !tty->link)
> - goto out;
> + if (tty == NULL || (pair = tty->link) == NULL)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - retval = -EIO;
> if (test_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->flags))
> + return -EIO;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pair->buf.lock, flags);
> + if (test_bit(TTY_PTY_LOCK, &pair->flags))
> goto out;
> - if (test_bit(TTY_PTY_LOCK, &tty->link->flags))
> - goto out;
> - if (tty->link->count != 1)
> + if (pair->count != 1)
> goto out;
>
> - clear_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->link->flags);
> + clear_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &pair->flags);
> + /* The buf.lock stops this racing a flush_to_ldisc from
> + the other end */
> + clear_bit(TTY_EOFPENDING, &pair->flags);
> + clear_bit(TTY_EOF, &pair->flags);
> set_bit(TTY_THROTTLED, &tty->flags);
> retval = 0;
> out:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pair->buf.lock, flags);
> return retval;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c
> index 810ee25..19a7ced 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tty_buffer.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,12 @@ static void __tty_buffer_flush(struct tty_struct *tty)
> tty_buffer_free(tty, thead);
> }
> tty->buf.tail = NULL;
> + /* We can EOF a pty/tty pair with a flush as well as by consuming
> + all the data left over */
> + if (test_bit(TTY_EOFPENDING, &tty->flags)) {
> + set_bit(TTY_EOF, &tty->flags);
> + wake_up(&tty->read_wait);
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -405,6 +411,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
> struct tty_buffer *tbuf, *head;
> char *char_buf;
> unsigned char *flag_buf;
> + int done = 1;
>
> disc = tty_ldisc_ref(tty);
> if (disc == NULL) /* !TTY_LDISC */
> @@ -433,10 +440,13 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
> break;
> if (!tty->receive_room) {
> schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 1);
> + done = 0;
> break;
> }
> - if (count > tty->receive_room)
> + if (count > tty->receive_room) {
> count = tty->receive_room;
> + done = 0;
> + }
> char_buf = head->char_buf_ptr + head->read;
> flag_buf = head->flag_buf_ptr + head->read;
> head->read += count;
> @@ -454,6 +464,10 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
> __tty_buffer_flush(tty);
> clear_bit(TTY_FLUSHPENDING, &tty->flags);
> wake_up(&tty->read_wait);
> + } else if (done && test_bit(TTY_EOFPENDING, &tty->flags)) {
> + /* The last bits hit the ldisc so set EOF */
> + wake_up(&tty->read_wait);
> + set_bit(TTY_EOF, &tty->flags);
> }
> clear_bit(TTY_FLUSHING, &tty->flags);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h
> index 85aa525..427d107 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tty.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tty.h
> @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ struct tty_struct {
> #define TTY_LDISC 9 /* Line discipline attached */
> #define TTY_LDISC_CHANGING 10 /* Line discipline changing */
> #define TTY_LDISC_OPEN 11 /* Line discipline is open */
> +#define TTY_EOF 12 /* TTY/PTY pair at EOF */
> +#define TTY_EOFPENDING 13 /* TTY/PTY pair EOF when data emptied */
> #define TTY_HW_COOK_OUT 14 /* Hardware can do output cooking */
> #define TTY_HW_COOK_IN 15 /* Hardware can do input cooking */
> #define TTY_PTY_LOCK 16 /* pty private */
>
>
With this patch i still have "the compile in emacs" problem. But it is less frequent.
1 in 5 tries fail now
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-23 23:45 [Regression] kdesu broken Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-24 0:21 ` Ray Lee
2009-07-24 15:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-24 15:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-24 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-25 6:04 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-25 13:31 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-25 14:05 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-25 14:55 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-25 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-26 11:51 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 10:57 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 12:07 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 12:46 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 13:23 ` [PATCH] " Alan Cox
2009-07-27 13:50 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 13:58 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 15:04 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 16:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-27 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 17:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-27 19:28 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 20:38 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 20:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 21:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 22:41 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 21:54 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27 21:20 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 5:33 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-28 10:22 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 10:42 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-28 15:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 17:09 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 17:06 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 18:56 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 19:15 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 19:56 ` Greg KH
2009-07-28 20:47 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-28 21:01 ` Greg KH
2009-07-28 22:02 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-28 23:49 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 0:12 ` Greg KH
2009-07-30 23:16 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-30 23:24 ` Greg KH
2009-07-31 13:49 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-31 14:17 ` Greg KH
2009-07-28 23:46 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 0:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 7:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-29 0:34 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 1:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 11:17 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 8:59 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 15:55 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 2:50 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-29 4:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-29 5:04 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-29 5:00 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-29 5:08 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-29 7:46 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-29 11:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-29 17:40 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-29 18:28 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-29 18:43 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-29 19:08 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-29 19:19 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-30 12:43 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-07-30 15:35 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-30 18:39 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-07-31 2:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-28 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28 16:16 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-07-27 18:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-07-27 13:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2009-07-25 20:12 ` [Regression] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 17:41 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-29 2:20 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-25 11:48 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-25 14:02 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-25 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-25 21:03 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-26 15:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-07-24 18:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-25 12:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-25 16:18 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-25 17:06 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-29 19:09 ` [Regression] kdesu broken, now usb fixed in current git pull Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090727135853.GA4223@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.