All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	krkumar2@in.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc_run() on a stopped TX queue
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:04:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090729110436.GA5490@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090729004428.GA765@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:44:28AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:59:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > The premise is that there'd be only one.  The qdisc lock.
> > 
> > If the traffic is distributed, flow wise, the driver XMIT
> > lock would spread due to multiqueue.
> 
> Suppose that we have a single large flow going through that has
> filled up the hardware queue and is now backlogged in the qdisc
> with qdisc_run on CPU A.   Now some other flow comes along and
> sends a packet on CPU B.
> 
> So now CPU A and B will both be processing packets for the first
> flow causing loads of lock contention.
> 
> But worse yet, we have introduced packet reordering.  So are you
> convinced now :)

How about this: instead of the _RUNNING flag we take tx lock while
holding qdisc lock and release qdisc lock just after (before xmit).
This should prevent reordering, and probably could improve cache use:
CPU B which takes qdisc lock only for enqueuing now, would use it for
dequeuing too, plus if accidentally the next xmit goes to a different
tx queue, it could start before CPU A finishes. Otherwise it would
simply wait for CPU A (without tx lock contention). Of course it
needs testing... 

Cheers,
Jarek P.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-29 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-20  7:46 [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc_run() on a stopped TX queue Krishna Kumar
2009-07-24  8:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-24  8:37   ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-24 10:31     ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-07-25  3:24       ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-25 11:04         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-25 11:12           ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-25 11:53             ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-28  2:28         ` David Miller
2009-07-28  2:48           ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-28  4:21             ` David Miller
2009-07-28  6:43               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-28  8:03                 ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-28  8:37                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-28  8:44                     ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-28  9:02                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-28 10:53                         ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-28 11:24                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-28 11:43                             ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-07-28 11:48                               ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-28 12:24                                 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-07-28 20:02                       ` David Miller
2009-07-28  7:12               ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-28 19:59                 ` David Miller
2009-07-29  0:44                   ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-29  1:06                     ` David Miller
2009-07-29  1:25                       ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-29  1:34                         ` David Miller
2009-07-29  2:12                           ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-29  2:22                             ` David Miller
2009-07-29  2:38                               ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-29  3:15                                 ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-04  3:15                                   ` David Miller
2009-07-29 11:04                     ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-07-29 11:11                       ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-29 11:26                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-29 12:30                           ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-29 12:47                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-29 13:08                               ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-07-29 19:26                                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-07-29 13:28                     ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-07-24 12:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-24 14:54   ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090729110436.GA5490@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.