From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Protect the seq start/next/stop sequence by rcu_read_lock()
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:00:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090729170007.f4e60858.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090729152101.1878.71159.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:26:57 +0100
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> Objects passed to kmemleak_seq_next() have an incremented reference
> count (hence not freed) but they may point via object_list.next to
> other freed objects. To avoid this, the whole start/next/stop sequence
> must be protected by rcu_read_lock().
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
>
> This is a fix for bug #13761 in buzilla.kernel.org. If there are no
> objections, please apply it before 2.6.31. Thanks.
Administrivia:
When referencing a bugzilla report, please quote the full URL within
the changelog (not after the ^---$). I use:
Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13761
This is because people ocassionally troll the commit logs, closing off
bugzilla reports. Using a standardised format simplifies that job, and
makes it more reliable.
Also, it's nice to give the original bug reporter a Reported-by: in the
changelog. As a little thank-you, and so they know what's going on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-30 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 15:26 [PATCH] kmemleak: Protect the seq start/next/stop sequence by rcu_read_lock() Catalin Marinas
2009-07-30 0:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-07-30 8:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-02 11:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 15:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-10 18:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 22:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-11 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-11 8:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 12:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-12 15:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-12 22:16 ` kmemleak: Protect the seq start/next/stop sequence byrcu_read_lock() Catalin Marinas
2009-08-13 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-13 9:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-13 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-13 14:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 22:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 22:47 ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Allow rescheduling during an object scanning Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 22:48 ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Ignore the aperture memory hole on x86_64 Catalin Marinas
2009-08-15 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-15 22:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-16 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 21:48 ` Catalin Marinas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-17 13:11 [PATCH] kmemleak: Protect the seq start/next/stop sequence by rcu_read_lock() Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090729170007.f4e60858.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.