From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B739150 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1NFamZgZ+Pfr for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:34:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.9]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:34:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:37:15 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20090803173715.GA22311@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20090803125342.CF87216440B5@mail.absint.com> <20090803143456.GA17977@fancy-poultry.org> <20090803173420.GC21647@fancy-poultry.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090803173420.GC21647@fancy-poultry.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] 1,5 TB partition: use cbc-essiv or xts-plain? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 03.08.2009, Heinz Diehl wrote: > The weakness is not related to the algorithm itself, but to the IV generator. s/IV generator/mode of operation Sorry!