From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: snapshot-removal - timeline ?
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:33:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090804183307.GG5693@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7EC11C2E-889E-42A4-80D8-EA7E80F4963D@karlsbakk.net>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> On 3. aug.. 2009, at 18.18, Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> >>On 3. aug.. 2009, at 15.04, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:03:37PM +0200, Roland wrote:
> >>>>Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>is there a timeline for snapshot-removal ?
> >>>>
> >>>>i did intensively play with btrfs about a year ago and was really
> >>>>impressed, but i quit due to the lack of snapshot removal.
> >>>>(i tried btrfs mostly because of the snapshot feature)
> >>>>
> >>>>has there been some progress on this or is there a timeline when
> >>>>this feature will be available ?
> >>>>
> >>>>i wonder if it`s just so hard to implement or if it`s just too low
> >>>>priority on the todo list..... maybe both ? ;)
> >>>
> >>>Its a little of both ;) The plan is to have this in 2.6.32
> >>
> >>
> >>Last I heard, someone was saying .31... Is it being moved?
> >
> >Yes, it was delayed so we could finalize the other changes in .31.
>
>
> It's strange that such a small thing should be delayed so much. If
> snapshot removal was working, I'm quite sure we might get more users
> and thereby more stable code faster.
It's a small feature but it gets deep into the difficult parts of the
dentry cache to do it right. So, it definitely isn't easy.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-01 12:03 snapshot-removal - timeline ? Roland
2009-08-03 13:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-03 14:33 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-03 16:18 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-04 7:52 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-04 15:02 ` Brian Neu
2009-08-04 18:33 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-08-05 11:18 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-08-05 11:54 ` Josef Bacik
2009-08-05 18:28 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-08-05 18:46 ` Christian Mikovits
2009-08-05 19:40 ` Andrey Kuzmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090804183307.GG5693@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.