From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
To: Joerg Albert <jal2@gmx.de>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ar9170: cleanup of bss_info_changed and beacon config
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:25:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908052225.16114.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A79D7E5.1080604@gmx.de>
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 21:05:09 Joerg Albert wrote:
> On 08/05/2009 04:04 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > the beacon timer isn't exclusively used to notify the driver when its
> > time for a new beacon... The STA mode uses the same _timer_
> > in reverse to wait for the next beacon form the assoc. AP.
> >
> > so, to be on the safe side: why not preserve the old behavior for the
> > STA mode as well and simply tell the hardware about dtim & beacon interval?
>
> ar9170_set_beacon_timers() uses the beacon interval only if for AP mode,
Although pretbtt is closely related to the beacon interval.
It has a slightly different purpose: It fires _before_ the beacon is sent.
So the host is able to do some _last msec_ changes to the beacon.
> dtim is left in STA mode.
both dtim_period and beacon_int are ORed
|
| if (ar->vif) {
| v |= ar->vif->bss_conf.beacon_int;
| switch() [...]
| v |= ar->vif->bss_conf.dtim_period << 16;
| }
|
into AR9170_MAC_REG_BCN_PERIOD.
It would be a BUG if this setting is omitted in STA mode,
since dtim beacons are essential.
> > The only remaining question is where to disabled the timer for STA.
> > (which is in some way relevant to: [PATCH 2/2] because previously,
> > these timers were always disabled by remove_interface.)
> >
> > I think the best place is in ar9170_op_bss_info_changed:
> > if (changed & BSS_CHANGED_ASSOC) {
> >
> > just when bss_conf->assoc gets "0".
>
> Yes. IMHO also enable on bss_conf->assoc == 1.
yes, but not necessary for bss_conf->assoc == 1,
ieee80211_set_associated sets BSS_CHANGED_BEACON_INT.
ar9170_set_beacon_timers is executed twice unless
you throw more code at it than just the assoc check & call.
But anyway, that's fine by me.
Thanks,
Chr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-05 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-05 0:13 [PATCH 1/2] ar9170: cleanup of bss_info_changed and beacon config Joerg Albert
2009-08-05 2:04 ` Christian Lamparter
2009-08-05 19:05 ` Joerg Albert
2009-08-05 20:25 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2009-08-07 14:42 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908052225.16114.chunkeey@web.de \
--to=chunkeey@web.de \
--cc=jal2@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.