From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>
To: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ll_ver_fs data verification failure - 96TB fs
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:04:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090806200400.GC1800@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28623.1249307676@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:54:36AM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Just a heads-up for now. I ran ll_ver_fs on a 96TB fs - the write phase
> finished without problems, but the read phase encountered a problem:
>
> ...
> read File name: /mnt/dir00373/file026
>
> liverfs: verify /mnt/dir00373/file026 failed offset/timestamp/inode 3244298240/1248819541/1096796: found 3243249664/1248819541/1096796 instead
>
> liverfs: Data verification failed
> 770.45user 218639.65system 67:38:18elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 100357573552inputs+195522668184outputs (1major+414minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> make: *** [llver] Error 2
>
>
> The offset difference is exactly 1M, and it occurs about 3GB into the file.
Interesting - exactly 1M off. Does this correspond to anything
interesting in extent layout or block allocation boundaries?
Any chance you can patch ll_ver_fs to continue after the first error?
I'd be happy to write the patch for you.
> In total, there are 726 directories, each with 32 4GB files (except the last,
> which only has 12 files). So directory 373 is roughly half-way. I'll take a look
> at the block allocation of both the directory and the file and see if they are
> straddling the 16TB boundary (or other such).
Did you have a chance to look at what falls before and after the 16TB
boundary?
Thanks,
-VAL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-03 13:54 ll_ver_fs data verification failure - 96TB fs Nick Dokos
2009-08-03 14:22 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 20:04 ` Valerie Aurora [this message]
2009-08-06 20:37 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 20:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-08-06 21:28 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 21:43 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 22:01 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 22:54 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 22:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-08-06 20:36 ` Valerie Aurora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090806200400.GC1800@shell \
--to=vaurora@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.