All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 6
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:50:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908062250.51498.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090806192209.513abec7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thursday 06 August 2009 11:22:09 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20090805:

At the moment -next is completely unusable for anything other than
detecting merge conflicts..  Running -next was never a completely
smooth experience but for a past year it was more-or-less doable.
However the last two months have been an absolute horror and I've
been hitting issues way faster than I was able to trace/report
them properly..

Right now I still have following *outstanding* issues (on just *one*
machine/distribution):

- Random (after some long hours) order:6 mode:0x8020 page allocation
  failure (when ipw2200 driver reloads firmware on firmware error).

  [ I had first thought that it was caused by SLQB (which got enabled
    as default somewhere along the way) but it also happens with SLUB
    and I have good reasons to believe that is caused by heavy mm
    changes first seen in next-20090618 (I've been testing next-20090617
    for many days and it never happened there), the last confirmed
    release with the problem is next-20090728. ]

- bdi warning, http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/15/262, (this one goes back
  to at least next-20090708, reconfirmed with next-20090806).

- Random OOPSes on shutdown (since the last week or so, didn't have time
  to investigate them).

- Lockup on stopping iptables (I've just noticed it in next-20090806,
  seems to also happen with next-20090731).

I give up and I'm back to using Linus' tree.. :(

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-06 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-06  9:22 linux-next: Tree for August 6 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-06 20:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-08-07 13:15   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-15 16:56     ` mm/ipw2200 regression (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 6) Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-15 16:56       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-16  7:31       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-16 10:17         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-16 10:17           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-06  3:27 linux-next: Tree for August 6 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-06  8:28 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200908062250.51498.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.