From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: PROC_COEF/PROC_INDEX question Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:38:59 +0800 Message-ID: <20090807093859.GA2155@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899BC103883 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:39:03 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Takashi Iwai List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hello, I'm not sure of the usage for GET_PROC_COEF/GET_COEF_INDEX, and found that their return value is unstable (changing all the time) for codec: Codec: Realtek ALC888 Address: 2 Function Id: 0x1 Vendor Id: 0x10ec0888 Subsystem Id: 0x80860023 Revision Id: 0x100202 For example: # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_PROC_COEF 0 nid = 0x20, verb = 0xc00, param = 0x0 value = 0x80 # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_COEF_INDEX 0 nid = 0x20, verb = 0xd00, param = 0x0 value = 0xe # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_PROC_COEF 0 nid = 0x20, verb = 0xc00, param = 0x0 value = 0x9c00 # hda-verb /dev/snd/hwC0D2 0x20 GET_COEF_INDEX 0 nid = 0x20, verb = 0xd00, param = 0x0 value = 0xf I wonder if this is the normal case? Thanks, Fengguang