From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:46:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908071946.07991.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090807.103610.209136140.davem@davemloft.net>
On Friday 07 August 2009 19:36:10 David Miller wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:27:36 +0200
>
> > Are you trying to tell me that after 6 weeks there is still no public
> > tree to hold future IDE changes?
> >
> > If this is indeed a case here I hope that it will get addressed ASAP.
>
> IDE is deep maintainence, we shouldn't be doing lots of changes,
> cleanups, and things of this nature. So urgency and timeliness
> is on a sincerely different scale for it.
Nobody is saying anything about cleanups and things of this nature..
> On the other hand, if you've been looking, I've been applying
> networking patches to net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 by the truckload
> on a daily basis because it is in active development.
Excellence in one area doesn't magically translate to other areas,
especially when said area needs a completely different approach:
I've been looking and I've seen you pushing non-trivial IDE bug-fix
patches with almost no wider hardware coverage to upstream (i.e. one
of my own patches which has been _explicitly_ marked as needing more
linux-next exposure)..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 21:29 [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-23 23:22 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 1:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-24 4:35 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 9:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-24 9:55 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 10:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-24 11:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-24 13:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-24 19:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-06-24 19:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-07-01 16:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-07-01 20:47 ` David Miller
2009-08-07 11:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-07 16:01 ` David Miller
2009-08-07 17:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-08-07 17:36 ` David Miller
2009-08-07 17:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-08-07 18:09 ` David Miller
2009-08-07 18:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908071946.07991.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.